Statizoid

Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) (DB15-20 methodology) by country

The creditor participation index has four components: (i) whether creditors appoint the insolvency representative or approve, ratify or reject the appointment of the insolvency representative; (ii) Whether creditors are required to approve the sale of substantial assets of the debtor in the course of insol­vency...

Countries reporting
168
Highest
4 DB15-20 methodology
Bulgaria
Lowest
0 DB15-20 methodology
Zambia
Median
2 DB15-20 methodology
Years covered
17
2003–2019
Data points
3,247

What the numbers show

Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) (DB15-20 methodology) is currently reported for 168 countries. The highest value is 4 DB15-20 methodology in Bulgaria; the lowest is 0 DB15-20 methodology in Zambia.

The median across all reporting countries is 2 DB15-20 methodology, and the mean is 1.77 DB15-20 methodology.

Over the past decade 23 countries rose and 2 fell. The largest increase was in Djibouti (up 300.0%), and the largest decrease in Zambia (down 100.0%).

Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4): full country ranking

#Country LatestYear 10-year changeTrend
1 Bulgaria 4 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 33.3% rising
1 Switzerland 4 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Djibouti 4 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 300.0% volatile
1 Kazakhstan 4 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 100.0% rising
1 Rwanda 4 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 33.3% rising
1 Serbia 4 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 100.0% volatile
7 Australia 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 50.0% rising
7 Azerbaijan 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 200.0% volatile
7 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
7 Brazil 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged rising
7 Barbados 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
7 Canada 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
7 Chile 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged falling
7 Czechia 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 50.0% rising
7 Germany 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
7 Estonia 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
7 Finland 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged rising
7 Georgia 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 200.0% rising
7 Grenada 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 200.0% volatile
7 Jamaica 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 50.0% rising
7 Kenya 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 200.0% volatile
7 Cambodia 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged volatile
7 Saint Kitts and Nevis 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 — volatile
7 Moldova 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
7 North Macedonia 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
7 Mauritius 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged rising
7 Nicaragua 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
7 Norway 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
7 Peru 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
7 Philippines 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
7 Puerto Rico 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
7 Portugal 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged rising
7 Russia 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
7 El Salvador 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
7 Slovakia 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged rising
7 Trinidad and Tobago 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 200.0% volatile
7 Turkey 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 50.0% rising
7 United States 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
7 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 3 DB15-20 methodology 2019 — volatile
40 Afghanistan 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 100.0% rising
40 Albania 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
40 Austria 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
40 Belgium 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
40 Belarus 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
40 Belize 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
40 China 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 100.0% volatile
40 Colombia 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 100.0% falling
40 Cape Verde 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 — volatile
40 Dominica 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
40 Denmark 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
40 Dominican Republic 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
40 Egypt 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
40 Fiji 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
40 United Kingdom 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
40 Guatemala 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
40 Croatia 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
40 Hungary 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
40 Indonesia 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged rising
40 Iceland 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
40 Israel 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 100.0% rising
40 Italy 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged rising
40 Kiribati 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
40 Latvia 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 100.0% rising
40 Morocco 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 — volatile
40 Mexico 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
40 Mozambique 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 — volatile
40 Malaysia 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
40 Netherlands 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
40 New Zealand 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
40 Pakistan 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
40 Panama 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 100.0% rising
40 Poland 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 100.0% rising
40 Paraguay 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
40 Romania 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
40 Saudi Arabia 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 — volatile
40 Suriname 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
40 Sweden 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
40 Seychelles 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 100.0% rising
40 Thailand 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
40 East Timor 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
40 Ukraine 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 up 100.0% rising
40 Uzbekistan 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged rising
40 Kosovo 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 — volatile
40 South Africa 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
40 Taiwan 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
40 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 2 DB15-20 methodology 2019 — volatile
87 United Arab Emirates 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 down 50.0% falling
87 Argentina 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Armenia 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Antigua and Barbuda 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Burundi 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Benin 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Burkina Faso 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Bahrain 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Bahamas 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 — volatile
87 Brunei 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 — volatile
87 Bhutan 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Central African Republic 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Cote d'Ivoire 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Cameroon 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Democratic Republic of Congo 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Congo 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Comoros 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Costa Rica 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Cyprus 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 — volatile
87 Algeria 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Ecuador 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Eritrea 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Spain 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged rising
87 Ethiopia 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 France 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged volatile
87 Gabon 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Guinea 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Guinea-Bissau 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Equatorial Guinea 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Greece 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Hong Kong 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Honduras 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Haiti 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 India 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Ireland 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Iran 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Iraq 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Jordan 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Japan 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Kyrgyzstan 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 — volatile
87 South Korea 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Kuwait 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Liberia 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 — volatile
87 Libya 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Sri Lanka 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged volatile
87 Lesotho 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Lithuania 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Luxembourg 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Madagascar 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Mali 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Malta 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Montenegro 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Malawi 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Namibia 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Niger 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Nigeria 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Oman 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Papua New Guinea 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Palestine 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Qatar 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged volatile
87 Senegal 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Singapore 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Solomon Islands 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 — volatile
87 Sierra Leone 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 South Sudan 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 — volatile
87 Slovenia 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Eswatini 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 — volatile
87 Syria 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Chad 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Togo 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Tajikistan 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged falling
87 Tonga 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Tunisia 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Tanzania 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 — volatile
87 Uganda 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 — volatile
87 Venezuela 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Vietnam 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Vanuatu 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
87 Samoa 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged volatile
87 Yemen 1 DB15-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
167 Sudan 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 — volatile
167 Zambia 0 DB15-20 methodology 2019 down 100.0% falling

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) by country. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/resolving-insolvency-creditor-participation-index-0-4-db15-20-methodology/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/resolving-insolvency-creditor-participation-index-0-4-db15-20-methodology/">Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) by country</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) (DB15-20 methodology)
Unit
DB15-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 3,247 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The creditor participation index has four components: (i) whether creditors appoint the insolvency representative or approve, ratify or reject the appointment of the insolvency representative; (ii) Whether creditors are required to approve the sale of substantial assets of the debtor in the course of insol­vency proceedings; (iii) Whether an individual creditor has the right to access financial information about the debtor during insolvency proceedings; and (iv) Whether an individual creditor can object to a decision of the court or of the insolvency representative to approve or reject claims against the debtor brought by the creditor itself and by other creditors.