Statizoid

Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) in China

China: Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) was 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2019)
2 DB15-20 methodology
Change on year
up 100.0%
World rank
40th
of 191 countries
All-time high
2 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
All-time low
0 DB15-20 methodology
in 2003
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) in China, 2003–2019

00.511.522003201120192003: 0 DB15-20 methodology2004: 0 DB15-20 methodology2005: 0 DB15-20 methodology2006: 0 DB15-20 methodology2007: 0 DB15-20 methodology2008: 1 DB15-20 methodology2009: 1 DB15-20 methodology2010: 1 DB15-20 methodology2011: 1 DB15-20 methodology2012: 1 DB15-20 methodology2013: 1 DB15-20 methodology2014: 1 DB15-20 methodology2015: 1 DB15-20 methodology2016: 1 DB15-20 methodology2017: 1 DB15-20 methodology2018: 1 DB15-20 methodology2019: 2 DB15-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.

Analysis

In 2019, resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) in China stood at 2 DB15-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.

The figure is up 100.0% on the previous year and up 100.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) in China peaked at 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2019 and was at its lowest, 0 DB15-20 methodology, in 2003.

China ranks 40th of 191 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) in China, year by year

Year DB15-20 methodology Change
2003 0 DB15-20 methodology —
2004 0 DB15-20 methodology —
2005 0 DB15-20 methodology —
2006 0 DB15-20 methodology —
2007 0 DB15-20 methodology —
2008 1 DB15-20 methodology —
2009 1 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2010 1 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2011 1 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2012 1 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2013 1 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2014 1 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2015 1 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2016 1 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2017 1 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2018 1 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2019 2 DB15-20 methodology +100.0%

China compared with similar countries

  • China's 2 DB15-20 methodology is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 2 DB15-20 methodology, 1.0× the median. (56 countries reporting)
  • China's 2 DB15-20 methodology is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 1 DB15-20 methodology, 2.0× the median. (28 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 0.2857 DB15-20 methodology 0 DB15-20 methodology 1 DB15-20 methodology 7
2010s 1.1 DB15-20 methodology 1 DB15-20 methodology 2 DB15-20 methodology 10

Countries ranked near China

  1. 40 Indonesia 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  2. 40 Pakistan 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  3. 40 Mexico 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  4. 40 Afghanistan 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  5. 40 Albania 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  6. 40 Austria 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  7. 40 Belarus 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  8. 40 Belgium 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  9. 40 Belize 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  10. 40 Cape Verde 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  11. 40 Colombia 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  12. 40 Croatia 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  13. 40 Denmark 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  14. 40 Dominica 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  15. 40 Dominican Republic 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  16. 40 Egypt 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  17. 40 Fiji 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  18. 40 Guatemala 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  19. 40 Hungary 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  20. 40 Iceland 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  21. 40 Israel 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  22. 40 Italy 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  23. 40 Kiribati 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  24. 40 Kosovo 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  25. 40 Latvia 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  26. 40 Malaysia 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  27. 40 Morocco 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  28. 40 Mozambique 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  29. 40 Netherlands 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  30. 40 New Zealand 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  31. 40 Panama 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  32. 40 Paraguay 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  33. 40 Poland 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  34. 40 Romania 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  35. 40 Saudi Arabia 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  36. 40 Seychelles 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  37. 40 South Africa 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  38. 40 Suriname 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  39. 40 Sweden 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  40. 40 Taiwan 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  41. 40 Thailand 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  42. 40 East Timor 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  43. 40 Ukraine 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  44. 40 United Kingdom 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  45. 40 Uzbekistan 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  46. 40 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 2 DB15-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for China

All data for China →

Frequently asked questions

What is resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) in China?
Resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) in China was 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) recorded in China?
The highest recorded value was 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2019.
What is the lowest resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) recorded in China?
The lowest recorded value was 0 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
How does China rank for resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4)?
China ranks 40th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) rising or falling in China?
Over the last ten years it is up 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this China data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) in China. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/resolving-insolvency-creditor-participation-index-0-4-db15-20-methodology/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/resolving-insolvency-creditor-participation-index-0-4-db15-20-methodology/china/">Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) in China</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) (DB15-20 methodology)
Unit
DB15-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 3,247 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The creditor participation index has four components: (i) whether creditors appoint the insolvency representative or approve, ratify or reject the appointment of the insolvency representative; (ii) Whether creditors are required to approve the sale of substantial assets of the debtor in the course of insol­vency proceedings; (iii) Whether an individual creditor has the right to access financial information about the debtor during insolvency proceedings; and (iv) Whether an individual creditor can object to a decision of the court or of the insolvency representative to approve or reject claims against the debtor brought by the creditor itself and by other creditors.