Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) in Norway
Norway: Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) was 3 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) in Norway, 2003–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.
Analysis
Norway recorded 3 DB15-20 methodology for resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) in Norway peaked at 3 DB15-20 methodology in 2003 and was at its lowest, 3 DB15-20 methodology, in 2003.
Norway ranks 6th of 188 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3 DB15-20 methodology | 3 DB15-20 methodology | 3 DB15-20 methodology | 7 |
| 2010s | 3 DB15-20 methodology | 3 DB15-20 methodology | 3 DB15-20 methodology | 10 |
Countries ranked near Norway
- 6 United States 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 6 Russia 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 6 Brazil 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 6 Australia 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 6 Azerbaijan 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 6 Barbados 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 6 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 6 Cambodia 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 6 Canada 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 6 Chile 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 6 Czechia 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 6 El Salvador 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 6 Estonia 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 6 Finland 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 6 Georgia 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 6 Germany 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 6 Grenada 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 6 Jamaica 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 6 Kenya 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 6 Mauritius 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 6 Moldova 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 6 Nicaragua 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 6 North Macedonia 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 6 Peru 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 6 Philippines 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 6 Portugal 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 6 Puerto Rico 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 6 Slovakia 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 6 Saint Kitts and Nevis 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 6 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 6 Trinidad and Tobago 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 6 Turkey 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Norway
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.3703 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3621 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.55 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0618 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.55 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.7734 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.48 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 6.9 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3366 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) in Norway?
- Resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) in Norway was 3 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) recorded in Norway?
- The highest recorded value was 3 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
- What is the lowest resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) recorded in Norway?
- The lowest recorded value was 3 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
- How does Norway rank for resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4)?
- Norway ranks 6th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
- Is resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) rising or falling in Norway?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Norway data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The creditor participation index has four components: (i) whether creditors appoint the insolvency representative or approve, ratify or reject the appointment of the insolvency representative; (ii) Whether creditors are required to approve the sale of substantial assets of the debtor in the course of insolvency proceedings; (iii) Whether an individual creditor has the right to access financial information about the debtor during insolvency proceedings; and (iv) Whether an individual creditor can object to a decision of the court or of the insolvency representative to approve or reject claims against the debtor brought by the creditor itself and by other creditors.