Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244): Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) was 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), 2003–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.
Analysis
The most recent figure for resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) is 2 DB15-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.
Over the whole period, resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) peaked at 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2006 and was at its lowest, 0 DB15-20 methodology, in 2003.
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 40th of 191 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), year by year
| Year | DB15-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2004 | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2005 | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2006 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2007 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0 DB15-20 methodology | -100.0% |
| 2009 | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2010 | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2011 | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2012 | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2013 | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2014 | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2015 | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2017 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2018 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.5714 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 7 |
| 2010s | 0.6 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 10 |
Countries ranked near Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
- 40 China 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 40 Indonesia 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 40 Pakistan 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 40 Mexico 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 40 Afghanistan 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 40 Albania 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 40 Austria 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 40 Belarus 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 40 Belgium 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 40 Belize 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 40 Cape Verde 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 40 Colombia 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 40 Croatia 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 40 Denmark 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 40 Dominica 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 40 Dominican Republic 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 40 Egypt 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 40 Fiji 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 40 Guatemala 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 40 Hungary 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 40 Iceland 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 40 Israel 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 40 Italy 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 40 Kiribati 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 40 Kosovo 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 40 Latvia 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 40 Malaysia 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 40 Morocco 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 40 Mozambique 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 40 Netherlands 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 40 New Zealand 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 40 Panama 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 40 Paraguay 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 40 Poland 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 40 Romania 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 40 Saudi Arabia 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 40 Seychelles 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 40 South Africa 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 40 Suriname 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 40 Sweden 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 40 Taiwan 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 40 Thailand 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 40 East Timor 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 40 Ukraine 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 40 United Kingdom 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 40 Uzbekistan 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
- Rule of Law - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5), gaps filled 0.0521 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 (2024)
- Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to) 0.1596 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 (2024)
- Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) -0.3219 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 (2024)
- Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) -0.2547 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 (2024)
- Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5), gaps -0.2229 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 (2024)
- Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to) -0.0613 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 (2024)
- Rule of Law - Governance estimate 0.0521 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 (2024)
- Rule of Law - Governance score 57.86 0-100 (2024)
- Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate 0.1596 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 (2024)
- Voice and Accountability - Governance score 59.64 0-100 (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- Resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) was 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) recorded in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- The highest recorded value was 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2006.
- What is the lowest resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) recorded in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
- How does Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank for resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4)?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 40th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The creditor participation index has four components: (i) whether creditors appoint the insolvency representative or approve, ratify or reject the appointment of the insolvency representative; (ii) Whether creditors are required to approve the sale of substantial assets of the debtor in the course of insolvency proceedings; (iii) Whether an individual creditor has the right to access financial information about the debtor during insolvency proceedings; and (iv) Whether an individual creditor can object to a decision of the court or of the insolvency representative to approve or reject claims against the debtor brought by the creditor itself and by other creditors.