Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) in Serbia

Serbia: Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) was 4 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2019)
4 DB15-20 methodology
Change on year
up 100.0%
World rank
1st
of 188 countries
All-time high
4 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
All-time low
0 DB15-20 methodology
in 2003
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) in Serbia, 2003–2019

012342003201120192003: 0 DB15-20 methodology2004: 0 DB15-20 methodology2005: 0 DB15-20 methodology2006: 2 DB15-20 methodology2007: 2 DB15-20 methodology2008: 2 DB15-20 methodology2009: 2 DB15-20 methodology2010: 2 DB15-20 methodology2011: 2 DB15-20 methodology2012: 2 DB15-20 methodology2013: 2 DB15-20 methodology2014: 2 DB15-20 methodology2015: 2 DB15-20 methodology2016: 2 DB15-20 methodology2017: 2 DB15-20 methodology2018: 2 DB15-20 methodology2019: 4 DB15-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.

Analysis

Serbia recorded 4 DB15-20 methodology for resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.

The figure is up 100.0% on the previous year and up 100.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) in Serbia peaked at 4 DB15-20 methodology in 2019 and was at its lowest, 0 DB15-20 methodology, in 2003.

Serbia ranks 1st of 188 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 1.14 DB15-20 methodology 0 DB15-20 methodology 2 DB15-20 methodology 7
2010s 2.2 DB15-20 methodology 2 DB15-20 methodology 4 DB15-20 methodology 10

Countries ranked near Serbia

  1. 1 Bulgaria 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
  2. 1 Djibouti 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
  3. 1 Kazakhstan 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
  4. 1 Rwanda 4 DB15-20 methodology compare
  5. 1 Switzerland 4 DB15-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Serbia

All data for Serbia →

Frequently asked questions

What is resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) in Serbia?
Resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) in Serbia was 4 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) recorded in Serbia?
The highest recorded value was 4 DB15-20 methodology in 2019.
What is the lowest resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) recorded in Serbia?
The lowest recorded value was 0 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
How does Serbia rank for resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4)?
Serbia ranks 1st out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) rising or falling in Serbia?
Over the last ten years it is up 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Serbia data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) (DB15-20 methodology)
Unit
DB15-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,230 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The creditor participation index has four components: (i) whether creditors appoint the insolvency representative or approve, ratify or reject the appointment of the insolvency representative; (ii) Whether creditors are required to approve the sale of substantial assets of the debtor in the course of insol­vency proceedings; (iii) Whether an individual creditor has the right to access financial information about the debtor during insolvency proceedings; and (iv) Whether an individual creditor can object to a decision of the court or of the insolvency representative to approve or reject claims against the debtor brought by the creditor itself and by other creditors.