Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) in Chile
Chile: Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) was 3 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. ▼ Falling
Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) in Chile, 2003–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.
Analysis
In 2019, resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) in Chile stood at 3 DB15-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) in Chile peaked at 3 DB15-20 methodology in 2003 and was at its lowest, 2 DB15-20 methodology, in 2013.
Chile ranks 7th of 191 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 17 years of available data.
Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) in Chile, year by year
| Year | DB15-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 3 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2004 | 3 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 3 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 3 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 3 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 3 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 3 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 3 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 3 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 3 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | -33.3% |
| 2014 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 3 DB15-20 methodology | +50.0% |
| 2016 | 3 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 3 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 3 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 3 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Chile compared with similar countries
- Chile's 3 DB15-20 methodology is above the median for high income countries, which is 2 DB15-20 methodology, 1.5× the median. (62 countries reporting)
- Chile's 3 DB15-20 methodology is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 2 DB15-20 methodology, 1.5× the median. (33 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3 DB15-20 methodology | 3 DB15-20 methodology | 3 DB15-20 methodology | 7 |
| 2010s | 2.8 DB15-20 methodology | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 3 DB15-20 methodology | 10 |
Countries ranked near Chile
- 7 United States 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 7 Russia 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 7 Brazil 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 7 Australia 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 7 Azerbaijan 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 7 Barbados 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 7 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 7 Cambodia 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 7 Canada 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 7 Czechia 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 7 El Salvador 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 7 Estonia 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 7 Finland 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 7 Georgia 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 7 Germany 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 7 Grenada 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 7 Jamaica 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 7 Kenya 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 7 Mauritius 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 7 Moldova 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 7 Nicaragua 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 7 North Macedonia 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 7 Norway 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 7 Peru 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 7 Philippines 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 7 Portugal 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 7 Puerto Rico 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 7 Slovakia 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 7 Saint Kitts and Nevis 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 7 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 7 Trinidad and Tobago 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 7 Turkey 3 DB15-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Chile
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9268 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.22 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.33 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2204 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 5.33 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.46 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 11.45 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 25.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.2 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) in Chile?
- Resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) in Chile was 3 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 3 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
- What is the lowest resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2013.
- How does Chile rank for resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4)?
- Chile ranks 7th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The creditor participation index has four components: (i) whether creditors appoint the insolvency representative or approve, ratify or reject the appointment of the insolvency representative; (ii) Whether creditors are required to approve the sale of substantial assets of the debtor in the course of insolvency proceedings; (iii) Whether an individual creditor has the right to access financial information about the debtor during insolvency proceedings; and (iv) Whether an individual creditor can object to a decision of the court or of the insolvency representative to approve or reject claims against the debtor brought by the creditor itself and by other creditors.