Statizoid

Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) in Palestine

Palestine: Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) was 1 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
1 DB15-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
87th
of 191 countries
All-time high
1 DB15-20 methodology
in 2003
All-time low
1 DB15-20 methodology
in 2003
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) in Palestine, 2003–2019

00.20.40.60.812003201120192003: 1 DB15-20 methodology2004: 1 DB15-20 methodology2005: 1 DB15-20 methodology2006: 1 DB15-20 methodology2007: 1 DB15-20 methodology2008: 1 DB15-20 methodology2009: 1 DB15-20 methodology2010: 1 DB15-20 methodology2011: 1 DB15-20 methodology2012: 1 DB15-20 methodology2013: 1 DB15-20 methodology2014: 1 DB15-20 methodology2015: 1 DB15-20 methodology2016: 1 DB15-20 methodology2017: 1 DB15-20 methodology2018: 1 DB15-20 methodology2019: 1 DB15-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.

Analysis

The most recent figure for resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) in Palestine is 1 DB15-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) in Palestine peaked at 1 DB15-20 methodology in 2003 and was at its lowest, 1 DB15-20 methodology, in 2003.

That places Palestine 87th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) in Palestine, year by year

Year DB15-20 methodology Change
2003 1 DB15-20 methodology —
2004 1 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2005 1 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2006 1 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2007 1 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2008 1 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2009 1 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2010 1 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2011 1 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2012 1 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2013 1 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2014 1 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2015 1 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2016 1 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2017 1 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2018 1 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2019 1 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 1 DB15-20 methodology 1 DB15-20 methodology 1 DB15-20 methodology 7
2010s 1 DB15-20 methodology 1 DB15-20 methodology 1 DB15-20 methodology 10

Countries ranked near Palestine

  1. 87 India 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  2. 87 Nigeria 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  3. 87 Japan 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  4. 87 Algeria 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  5. 87 Antigua and Barbuda 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  6. 87 Argentina 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  7. 87 Armenia 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  8. 87 Bahamas 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  9. 87 Bahrain 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  10. 87 Benin 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  11. 87 Bhutan 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  12. 87 Brunei 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  13. 87 Burkina Faso 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  14. 87 Burundi 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  15. 87 Cameroon 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  16. 87 Central African Republic 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  17. 87 Chad 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  18. 87 Comoros 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  19. 87 Democratic Republic of Congo 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  20. 87 Congo 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  21. 87 Costa Rica 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  22. 87 Cote d'Ivoire 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  23. 87 Cyprus 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  24. 87 Ecuador 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  25. 87 Equatorial Guinea 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  26. 87 Eritrea 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  27. 87 Eswatini 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  28. 87 Ethiopia 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  29. 87 France 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  30. 87 Gabon 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  31. 87 Greece 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  32. 87 Guinea 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  33. 87 Guinea-Bissau 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  34. 87 Haiti 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  35. 87 Honduras 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  36. 87 Hong Kong 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  37. 87 Iran 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  38. 87 Iraq 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  39. 87 Ireland 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  40. 87 Jordan 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  41. 87 South Korea 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  42. 87 Kuwait 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  43. 87 Kyrgyzstan 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  44. 87 Lesotho 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  45. 87 Liberia 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  46. 87 Libya 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  47. 87 Lithuania 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  48. 87 Luxembourg 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  49. 87 Madagascar 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  50. 87 Malawi 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  51. 87 Mali 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  52. 87 Malta 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  53. 87 Montenegro 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  54. 87 Namibia 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  55. 87 Niger 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  56. 87 Oman 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  57. 87 Papua New Guinea 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  58. 87 Qatar 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  59. 87 Samoa 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  60. 87 Senegal 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  61. 87 Sierra Leone 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  62. 87 Singapore 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  63. 87 Slovenia 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  64. 87 Solomon Islands 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  65. 87 South Sudan 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  66. 87 Spain 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  67. 87 Sri Lanka 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  68. 87 Syria 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  69. 87 Tajikistan 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  70. 87 Tanzania 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  71. 87 Togo 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  72. 87 Tonga 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  73. 87 Tunisia 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  74. 87 Uganda 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  75. 87 United Arab Emirates 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  76. 87 Vanuatu 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  77. 87 Venezuela 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  78. 87 Vietnam 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
  79. 87 Yemen 1 DB15-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Palestine

All data for Palestine →

Frequently asked questions

What is resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) in Palestine?
Resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) in Palestine was 1 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) recorded in Palestine?
The highest recorded value was 1 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
What is the lowest resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) recorded in Palestine?
The lowest recorded value was 1 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
How does Palestine rank for resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4)?
Palestine ranks 87th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) rising or falling in Palestine?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Palestine data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) in Palestine. Statizoid. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/resolving-insolvency-creditor-participation-index-0-4-db15-20-methodology/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/resolving-insolvency-creditor-participation-index-0-4-db15-20-methodology/west-bank-and-gaza/">Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) in Palestine</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) (DB15-20 methodology)
Unit
DB15-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 3,247 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The creditor participation index has four components: (i) whether creditors appoint the insolvency representative or approve, ratify or reject the appointment of the insolvency representative; (ii) Whether creditors are required to approve the sale of substantial assets of the debtor in the course of insol­vency proceedings; (iii) Whether an individual creditor has the right to access financial information about the debtor during insolvency proceedings; and (iv) Whether an individual creditor can object to a decision of the court or of the insolvency representative to approve or reject claims against the debtor brought by the creditor itself and by other creditors.