Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) in France
France: Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) was 1 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) in France, 2003–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.
Analysis
In 2019, resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) in France stood at 1 DB15-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) in France peaked at 1 DB15-20 methodology in 2009 and was at its lowest, 0 DB15-20 methodology, in 2003.
That places France 84th out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1429 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | 1 DB15-20 methodology | 7 |
| 2010s | 1 DB15-20 methodology | 1 DB15-20 methodology | 1 DB15-20 methodology | 10 |
Countries ranked near France
- 84 India 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Nigeria 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Japan 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Algeria 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Antigua and Barbuda 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Argentina 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Armenia 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Bahamas 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Bahrain 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Benin 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Bhutan 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Brunei 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Burkina Faso 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Burundi 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Cameroon 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Central African Republic 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Chad 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Comoros 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Democratic Republic of Congo 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Congo 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Costa Rica 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Cote d'Ivoire 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Cyprus 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Ecuador 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Equatorial Guinea 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Eritrea 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Eswatini 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Ethiopia 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Gabon 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Greece 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Guinea 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Guinea-Bissau 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Haiti 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Honduras 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Hong Kong 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Iran 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Iraq 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Ireland 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Jordan 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 South Korea 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Kuwait 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Kyrgyzstan 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Lesotho 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Liberia 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Libya 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Lithuania 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Luxembourg 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Madagascar 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Malawi 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Mali 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Malta 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Montenegro 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Namibia 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Niger 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Oman 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Papua New Guinea 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Qatar 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Samoa 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Senegal 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Sierra Leone 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Singapore 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Slovenia 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Solomon Islands 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 South Sudan 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Spain 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Sri Lanka 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Syria 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Tajikistan 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Tanzania 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Togo 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Tonga 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Tunisia 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Uganda 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 United Arab Emirates 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Vanuatu 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Venezuela 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Vietnam 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Palestine 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 84 Yemen 1 DB15-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for France
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 5.48 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.93 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 22.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.81 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 22.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 18.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 11.75 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 14.49 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 106.68 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 15.3 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) in France?
- Resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) in France was 1 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) recorded in France?
- The highest recorded value was 1 DB15-20 methodology in 2009.
- What is the lowest resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) recorded in France?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
- How does France rank for resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4)?
- France ranks 84th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
- Is resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) rising or falling in France?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this France data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The creditor participation index has four components: (i) whether creditors appoint the insolvency representative or approve, ratify or reject the appointment of the insolvency representative; (ii) Whether creditors are required to approve the sale of substantial assets of the debtor in the course of insolvency proceedings; (iii) Whether an individual creditor has the right to access financial information about the debtor during insolvency proceedings; and (iv) Whether an individual creditor can object to a decision of the court or of the insolvency representative to approve or reject claims against the debtor brought by the creditor itself and by other creditors.