Statizoid

Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) in Uzbekistan, Republic of

Uzbekistan, Republic of: Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) was 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
2 DB15-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
40th
of 190 countries
All-time high
2 DB15-20 methodology
in 2004
All-time low
1 DB15-20 methodology
in 2003
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) in Uzbekistan, Republic of, 2003–2019

00.511.522003201120192003: 1 DB15-20 methodology2004: 2 DB15-20 methodology2005: 2 DB15-20 methodology2006: 2 DB15-20 methodology2007: 2 DB15-20 methodology2008: 2 DB15-20 methodology2009: 2 DB15-20 methodology2010: 2 DB15-20 methodology2011: 2 DB15-20 methodology2012: 2 DB15-20 methodology2013: 2 DB15-20 methodology2014: 2 DB15-20 methodology2015: 2 DB15-20 methodology2016: 2 DB15-20 methodology2017: 2 DB15-20 methodology2018: 2 DB15-20 methodology2019: 2 DB15-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.

Analysis

Uzbekistan, Republic of recorded 2 DB15-20 methodology for resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) in Uzbekistan, Republic of peaked at 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2004 and was at its lowest, 1 DB15-20 methodology, in 2003.

Uzbekistan, Republic of ranks 40th of 190 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 17 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 1.86 DB15-20 methodology 1 DB15-20 methodology 2 DB15-20 methodology 7
2010s 2 DB15-20 methodology 2 DB15-20 methodology 2 DB15-20 methodology 10

Countries ranked near Uzbekistan, Republic of

  1. 40 China, People's Republic of 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  2. 40 Indonesia 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  3. 40 Pakistan 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  4. 40 Mexico 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  5. 40 Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  6. 40 Albania 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  7. 40 Austria 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  8. 40 Belarus, Republic of 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  9. 40 Belgium 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  10. 40 Belize 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  11. 40 Cabo Verde 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  12. 40 Colombia 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  13. 40 Croatia, Republic of 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  14. 40 Denmark 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  15. 40 Dominica 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  16. 40 Dominican Republic 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  17. 40 Egypt, Arab Republic of 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  18. 40 Fiji, Republic of 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  19. 40 Guatemala 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  20. 40 Hungary 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  21. 40 Iceland 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  22. 40 Israel 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  23. 40 Italy 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  24. 40 Kiribati 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  25. 40 Kosovo 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  26. 40 Latvia, Republic of 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  27. 40 Malaysia 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  28. 40 Morocco 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  29. 40 Mozambique, Republic of 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  30. 40 Netherlands, The 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  31. 40 New Zealand 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  32. 40 Panama 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  33. 40 Paraguay 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  34. 40 Poland, Republic of 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  35. 40 Romania 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  36. 40 Saudi Arabia 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  37. 40 Seychelles 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  38. 40 South Africa 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  39. 40 Suriname 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  40. 40 Sweden 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  41. 40 Taiwan Province of China 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  42. 40 Thailand 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  43. 40 Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  44. 40 Ukraine 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  45. 40 United Kingdom 2 DB15-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Uzbekistan, Republic of

All data for Uzbekistan, Republic of →

Frequently asked questions

What is resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) in Uzbekistan, Republic of?
Resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) in Uzbekistan, Republic of was 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) recorded in Uzbekistan, Republic of?
The highest recorded value was 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2004.
What is the lowest resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) recorded in Uzbekistan, Republic of?
The lowest recorded value was 1 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
How does Uzbekistan, Republic of rank for resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4)?
Uzbekistan, Republic of ranks 40th out of 190 countries with data for 2019.
Is resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) rising or falling in Uzbekistan, Republic of?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Uzbekistan, Republic of data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) in Uzbekistan, Republic of. Statizoid. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/resolving-insolvency-creditor-participation-index-0-4-db15-20-methodology/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/resolving-insolvency-creditor-participation-index-0-4-db15-20-methodology/uzbekistan/">Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) in Uzbekistan, Republic of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) (DB15-20 methodology)
Unit
DB15-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,230 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The creditor participation index has four components: (i) whether creditors appoint the insolvency representative or approve, ratify or reject the appointment of the insolvency representative; (ii) Whether creditors are required to approve the sale of substantial assets of the debtor in the course of insol­vency proceedings; (iii) Whether an individual creditor has the right to access financial information about the debtor during insolvency proceedings; and (iv) Whether an individual creditor can object to a decision of the court or of the insolvency representative to approve or reject claims against the debtor brought by the creditor itself and by other creditors.