Statizoid

Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) in Denmark

Denmark: Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) was 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
2 DB15-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
39th
of 188 countries
All-time high
2 DB15-20 methodology
in 2003
All-time low
2 DB15-20 methodology
in 2003
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) in Denmark, 2003–2019

00.511.522003201120192003: 2 DB15-20 methodology2004: 2 DB15-20 methodology2005: 2 DB15-20 methodology2006: 2 DB15-20 methodology2007: 2 DB15-20 methodology2008: 2 DB15-20 methodology2009: 2 DB15-20 methodology2010: 2 DB15-20 methodology2011: 2 DB15-20 methodology2012: 2 DB15-20 methodology2013: 2 DB15-20 methodology2014: 2 DB15-20 methodology2015: 2 DB15-20 methodology2016: 2 DB15-20 methodology2017: 2 DB15-20 methodology2018: 2 DB15-20 methodology2019: 2 DB15-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.

Analysis

The most recent figure for resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) in Denmark is 2 DB15-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) in Denmark peaked at 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2003 and was at its lowest, 2 DB15-20 methodology, in 2003.

That places Denmark 39th out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 2 DB15-20 methodology 2 DB15-20 methodology 2 DB15-20 methodology 7
2010s 2 DB15-20 methodology 2 DB15-20 methodology 2 DB15-20 methodology 10

Countries ranked near Denmark

  1. 39 China 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  2. 39 Indonesia 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  3. 39 Pakistan 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  4. 39 Mexico 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  5. 39 Afghanistan 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  6. 39 Albania 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  7. 39 Austria 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  8. 39 Belarus 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  9. 39 Belgium 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  10. 39 Belize 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  11. 39 Cape Verde 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  12. 39 Colombia 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  13. 39 Croatia 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  14. 39 Dominica 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  15. 39 Dominican Republic 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  16. 39 Egypt 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  17. 39 Fiji 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  18. 39 Guatemala 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  19. 39 Hungary 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  20. 39 Iceland 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  21. 39 Israel 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  22. 39 Italy 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  23. 39 Kiribati 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  24. 39 Latvia 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  25. 39 Malaysia 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  26. 39 Morocco 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  27. 39 Mozambique 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  28. 39 Netherlands 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  29. 39 New Zealand 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  30. 39 Panama 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  31. 39 Paraguay 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  32. 39 Poland 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  33. 39 Romania 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  34. 39 Saudi Arabia 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  35. 39 Seychelles 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  36. 39 South Africa 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  37. 39 Suriname 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  38. 39 Sweden 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  39. 39 Taiwan 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  40. 39 Thailand 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  41. 39 East Timor 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  42. 39 Ukraine 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  43. 39 United Kingdom 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  44. 39 Uzbekistan 2 DB15-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Denmark

All data for Denmark →

Frequently asked questions

What is resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) in Denmark?
Resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) in Denmark was 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) recorded in Denmark?
The highest recorded value was 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
What is the lowest resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) recorded in Denmark?
The lowest recorded value was 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
How does Denmark rank for resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4)?
Denmark ranks 39th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) rising or falling in Denmark?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Denmark data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) (DB15-20 methodology)
Unit
DB15-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,230 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The creditor participation index has four components: (i) whether creditors appoint the insolvency representative or approve, ratify or reject the appointment of the insolvency representative; (ii) Whether creditors are required to approve the sale of substantial assets of the debtor in the course of insol­vency proceedings; (iii) Whether an individual creditor has the right to access financial information about the debtor during insolvency proceedings; and (iv) Whether an individual creditor can object to a decision of the court or of the insolvency representative to approve or reject claims against the debtor brought by the creditor itself and by other creditors.