Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Georgia
Georgia: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program was 0.0% in 2019. ▬ Flat
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Georgia, 1999–2019
Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Measured in %.
Analysis
The most recent figure for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Georgia is 0.0%, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 18 years on record.
Over the whole period, gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Georgia peaked at 0.0% in 1999 and was at its lowest, 0.0%, in 1999.
That places Georgia 69th out of 177 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1 |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 8 |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 9 |
Countries ranked near Georgia
- 66 Guatemala 1.4% compare
- 67 Rwanda 0.6% compare
- 68 Turkiye 0.3% compare
- 69 Afghanistan 0.0% compare
- 69 Albania 0.0% compare
- 69 Algeria 0.0% compare
- 69 Andorra 0.0% compare
- 69 Armenia 0.0% compare
- 69 Aruba 0.0% compare
- 69 Bahamas, The 0.0% compare
- 69 Bangladesh 0.0% compare
- 69 Barbados 0.0% compare
- 69 Belize 0.0% compare
- 69 Benin 0.0% compare
- 69 Bermuda 0.0% compare
- 69 Bhutan 0.0% compare
- 69 Bolivia 0.0% compare
- 69 Botswana 0.0% compare
- 69 Brunei Darussalam 0.0% compare
- 69 Bulgaria 0.0% compare
- 69 Burkina Faso 0.0% compare
- 69 Burundi 0.0% compare
- 69 Cabo Verde 0.0% compare
- 69 Cameroon 0.0% compare
- 69 Central African Republic 0.0% compare
- 69 Chad 0.0% compare
- 69 China 0.0% compare
- 69 Colombia 0.0% compare
- 69 Congo, Dem. Rep. 0.0% compare
- 69 Congo, Rep. 0.0% compare
- 69 Cote d'Ivoire 0.0% compare
- 69 Czechia 0.0% compare
- 69 Djibouti 0.0% compare
- 69 Dominican Republic 0.0% compare
- 69 Ecuador 0.0% compare
- 69 Egypt, Arab Rep. 0.0% compare
- 69 Eritrea 0.0% compare
- 69 Eswatini 0.0% compare
- 69 Ethiopia 0.0% compare
- 69 Fiji 0.0% compare
- 69 France 0.0% compare
- 69 Guinea 0.0% compare
- 69 Guyana 0.0% compare
- 69 Honduras 0.0% compare
- 69 Hong Kong 0.0% compare
- 69 India 0.0% compare
- 69 Iran, Islamic Rep. 0.0% compare
- 69 Italy 0.0% compare
- 69 Japan 0.0% compare
- 69 Jordan 0.0% compare
- 69 Kenya 0.0% compare
- 69 Kiribati 0.0% compare
- 69 Kuwait 0.0% compare
- 69 Lebanon 0.0% compare
- 69 Lesotho 0.0% compare
- 69 Liberia 0.0% compare
- 69 Liechtenstein 0.0% compare
- 69 Luxembourg 0.0% compare
- 69 Macao 0.0% compare
- 69 Madagascar 0.0% compare
- 69 Malawi 0.0% compare
- 69 Malaysia 0.0% compare
- 69 Maldives 0.0% compare
- 69 Mali 0.0% compare
- 69 Malta 0.0% compare
- 69 Marshall Islands 0.0% compare
- 69 Mauritania 0.0% compare
- 69 Micronesia, Fed. Sts. 0.0% compare
- 69 Monaco 0.0% compare
- 69 Mongolia 0.0% compare
- 69 Mozambique 0.0% compare
- 69 Naoero 0.0% compare
- 69 Nepal 0.0% compare
- 69 Netherlands 0.0% compare
- 69 Niger 0.0% compare
- 69 Oman 0.0% compare
- 69 Pakistan 0.0% compare
- 69 Palau 0.0% compare
- 69 Papua New Guinea 0.0% compare
- 69 Philippines 0.0% compare
- 69 Poland 0.0% compare
- 69 Portugal 0.0% compare
- 69 Samoa 0.0% compare
- 69 Saudi Arabia 0.0% compare
- 69 Senegal 0.0% compare
- 69 Seychelles 0.0% compare
- 69 Sierra Leone 0.0% compare
- 69 Slovak Republic 0.0% compare
- 69 Solomon Islands 0.0% compare
- 69 Sri Lanka 0.0% compare
- 69 St. Vincent and the Grenadines 0.0% compare
- 69 Sudan 0.0% compare
- 69 Suriname 0.0% compare
- 69 Switzerland 0.0% compare
- 69 Syrian Arab Republic 0.0% compare
- 69 Tajikistan 0.0% compare
- 69 Tanzania 0.0% compare
- 69 Timor-Leste 0.0% compare
- 69 Togo 0.0% compare
- 69 Tonga 0.0% compare
- 69 Trinidad and Tobago 0.0% compare
- 69 Tunisia 0.0% compare
- 69 Turks and Caicos Islands 0.0% compare
- 69 Tuvalu 0.0% compare
- 69 Uganda 0.0% compare
- 69 Ukraine 0.0% compare
- 69 Uzbekistan 0.0% compare
- 69 Vanuatu 0.0% compare
- 69 West Bank and Gaza 0.0% compare
- 69 Zambia 0.0% compare
- 69 Zimbabwe 0.0% compare
More reference data data for Georgia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.097 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.684 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0278 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.3252 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2904 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 3.69 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.28 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1515 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Georgia?
- Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Georgia was 0.0% in 2019, according to UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
- What is the highest gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program recorded in Georgia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0% in 1999.
- What is the lowest gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program recorded in Georgia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0% in 1999.
- How does Georgia rank for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- Georgia ranks 69th out of 177 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Georgia data come from?
- The figures come from UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as part of Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 18 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.