Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Bhutan
Bhutan: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program was 0.0% in 2020. ▬ Flat
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Bhutan, 1998–2020
Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Measured in %.
Analysis
Bhutan recorded 0.0% for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in 2020. That is the highest value across all 19 years on record.
Over the whole period, gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Bhutan peaked at 0.0% in 1998 and was at its lowest, 0.0%, in 1998.
Bhutan ranks 69th of 177 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 7 |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 9 |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1 |
Countries ranked near Bhutan
- 66 Guatemala 1.4% compare
- 67 Rwanda 0.6% compare
- 68 Turkiye 0.3% compare
- 69 Afghanistan 0.0% compare
- 69 Albania 0.0% compare
- 69 Algeria 0.0% compare
- 69 Andorra 0.0% compare
- 69 Armenia 0.0% compare
- 69 Aruba 0.0% compare
- 69 Bahamas, The 0.0% compare
- 69 Bangladesh 0.0% compare
- 69 Barbados 0.0% compare
- 69 Belize 0.0% compare
- 69 Benin 0.0% compare
- 69 Bermuda 0.0% compare
- 69 Bolivia 0.0% compare
- 69 Botswana 0.0% compare
- 69 Brunei Darussalam 0.0% compare
- 69 Bulgaria 0.0% compare
- 69 Burkina Faso 0.0% compare
- 69 Burundi 0.0% compare
- 69 Cabo Verde 0.0% compare
- 69 Cameroon 0.0% compare
- 69 Central African Republic 0.0% compare
- 69 Chad 0.0% compare
- 69 China 0.0% compare
- 69 Colombia 0.0% compare
- 69 Congo, Dem. Rep. 0.0% compare
- 69 Congo, Rep. 0.0% compare
- 69 Cote d'Ivoire 0.0% compare
- 69 Czechia 0.0% compare
- 69 Djibouti 0.0% compare
- 69 Dominican Republic 0.0% compare
- 69 Ecuador 0.0% compare
- 69 Egypt, Arab Rep. 0.0% compare
- 69 Eritrea 0.0% compare
- 69 Eswatini 0.0% compare
- 69 Ethiopia 0.0% compare
- 69 Fiji 0.0% compare
- 69 France 0.0% compare
- 69 Georgia 0.0% compare
- 69 Guinea 0.0% compare
- 69 Guyana 0.0% compare
- 69 Honduras 0.0% compare
- 69 Hong Kong 0.0% compare
- 69 India 0.0% compare
- 69 Iran, Islamic Rep. 0.0% compare
- 69 Italy 0.0% compare
- 69 Japan 0.0% compare
- 69 Jordan 0.0% compare
- 69 Kenya 0.0% compare
- 69 Kiribati 0.0% compare
- 69 Kuwait 0.0% compare
- 69 Lebanon 0.0% compare
- 69 Lesotho 0.0% compare
- 69 Liberia 0.0% compare
- 69 Liechtenstein 0.0% compare
- 69 Luxembourg 0.0% compare
- 69 Macao 0.0% compare
- 69 Madagascar 0.0% compare
- 69 Malawi 0.0% compare
- 69 Malaysia 0.0% compare
- 69 Maldives 0.0% compare
- 69 Mali 0.0% compare
- 69 Malta 0.0% compare
- 69 Marshall Islands 0.0% compare
- 69 Mauritania 0.0% compare
- 69 Micronesia, Fed. Sts. 0.0% compare
- 69 Monaco 0.0% compare
- 69 Mongolia 0.0% compare
- 69 Mozambique 0.0% compare
- 69 Naoero 0.0% compare
- 69 Nepal 0.0% compare
- 69 Netherlands 0.0% compare
- 69 Niger 0.0% compare
- 69 Oman 0.0% compare
- 69 Pakistan 0.0% compare
- 69 Palau 0.0% compare
- 69 Papua New Guinea 0.0% compare
- 69 Philippines 0.0% compare
- 69 Poland 0.0% compare
- 69 Portugal 0.0% compare
- 69 Samoa 0.0% compare
- 69 Saudi Arabia 0.0% compare
- 69 Senegal 0.0% compare
- 69 Seychelles 0.0% compare
- 69 Sierra Leone 0.0% compare
- 69 Slovak Republic 0.0% compare
- 69 Solomon Islands 0.0% compare
- 69 Sri Lanka 0.0% compare
- 69 St. Vincent and the Grenadines 0.0% compare
- 69 Sudan 0.0% compare
- 69 Suriname 0.0% compare
- 69 Switzerland 0.0% compare
- 69 Syrian Arab Republic 0.0% compare
- 69 Tajikistan 0.0% compare
- 69 Tanzania 0.0% compare
- 69 Timor-Leste 0.0% compare
- 69 Togo 0.0% compare
- 69 Tonga 0.0% compare
- 69 Trinidad and Tobago 0.0% compare
- 69 Tunisia 0.0% compare
- 69 Turks and Caicos Islands 0.0% compare
- 69 Tuvalu 0.0% compare
- 69 Uganda 0.0% compare
- 69 Ukraine 0.0% compare
- 69 Uzbekistan 0.0% compare
- 69 Vanuatu 0.0% compare
- 69 West Bank and Gaza 0.0% compare
- 69 Zambia 0.0% compare
- 69 Zimbabwe 0.0% compare
More reference data data for Bhutan
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 155.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management 4.06 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 4.44 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure left on Pasture 92.47 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 19.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure applied to Soils 19.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.5687 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0909 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0727 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Enteric Fermentat 621.75 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Bhutan?
- Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program in Bhutan was 0.0% in 2020, according to UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
- What is the highest gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program recorded in Bhutan?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0% in 1998.
- What is the lowest gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program recorded in Bhutan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0% in 1998.
- How does Bhutan rank for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- Bhutan ranks 69th out of 177 countries with data for 2020.
- Where does this Bhutan data come from?
- The figures come from UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as part of Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 19 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.