Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Micronesia (country)
Micronesia (country): Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score was 25.9% in 2019. ▬ Flat
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Micronesia (country), 2003–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Micronesia (country) is 25.9%, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Micronesia (country) peaked at 25.9% in 2003 and was at its lowest, 25.9%, in 2003.
Micronesia (country) ranks 179th of 191 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Micronesia (country), year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 25.9% | — |
| 2004 | 25.9% | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 25.9% | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 25.9% | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 25.9% | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 25.9% | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 25.9% | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 25.9% | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 25.9% | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 25.9% | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 25.9% | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 25.9% | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 25.9% | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 25.9% | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 25.9% | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 25.9% | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 25.9% | +0.0% |
Micronesia (country) compared with similar countries
- Micronesia (country)'s 25.9% is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 67.7%, 38% of the median. (56 countries reporting)
- Micronesia (country)'s 25.9% is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 64.9%, 40% of the median. (28 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.9% | 25.9% | 25.9% | 7 |
| 2010s | 25.9% | 25.9% | 25.9% | 10 |
Countries ranked near Micronesia (country)
More reference data data for Micronesia (country)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0003 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on 16.58 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Crop Residues 0.0232 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural 20.76 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop 0.0018 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Manure Management 1.05 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture 3.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Enteric Fermentation 1.94 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure left on Pasture 16.58 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Burning - Crop 0.0074 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Micronesia (country)?
- Enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Micronesia (country) was 25.9% in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score recorded in Micronesia (country)?
- The highest recorded value was 25.9% in 2003.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score recorded in Micronesia (country)?
- The lowest recorded value was 25.9% in 2003.
- How does Micronesia (country) rank for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Micronesia (country) ranks 179th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score rising or falling in Micronesia (country)?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Micronesia (country) data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.