Bangladesh vs Micronesia (country): Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Bangladesh
25.0%
in 2019
Micronesia (country)
25.9%
in 2019
Bangladesh rank
180th
Micronesia (country) rank
179th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Bangladesh
- Micronesia (country)
How they compare
Micronesia (country) currently reports 25.9% against 25.0% in Bangladesh, a difference of 0.9%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Micronesia (country) has been ahead every year.
Bangladesh ranks 180th and Micronesia (country) ranks 179th of 191 countries.
Micronesia (country) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Micronesia (country) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.0% | 25.9% | 0.9% | Micronesia (country) |
| 2010s | 25.0% | 25.9% | 0.9% | Micronesia (country) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Bangladesh or Micronesia (country)?
- Micronesia (country), at 25.9% against 25.0% in Bangladesh as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Bangladesh and Micronesia (country)?
- 0.9%, with Micronesia (country) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Micronesia (country)?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Bangladesh and Micronesia (country) rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Bangladesh ranks 180th and Micronesia (country) ranks 179th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.