Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Indonesia

Indonesia: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score was 21.1% in 2019. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2019)
21.1%
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
182nd
of 191 countries
All-time high
21.1%
in 2013
All-time low
0.0%
in 2003
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Indonesia, 2003–2019

051015202003201120192003: 02004: 02005: 02006: 02007: 02008: 02009: 02010: 02011: 02012: 02013: 21.12014: 21.12015: 21.12016: 21.12017: 21.12018: 21.12019: 21.1

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Indonesia recorded 21.1% for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over five years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Indonesia peaked at 21.1% in 2013 and was at its lowest, 0.0%, in 2003.

Indonesia ranks 182nd of 191 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Indonesia, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Indonesia, 2003 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2003 0.0% —
2004 0.0% —
2005 0.0% —
2006 0.0% —
2007 0.0% —
2008 0.0% —
2009 0.0% —
2010 0.0% —
2011 0.0% —
2012 0.0% —
2013 21.1% —
2014 21.1% +0.0%
2015 21.1% +0.0%
2016 21.1% +0.0%
2017 21.1% +0.0%
2018 21.1% +0.0%
2019 21.1% +0.0%

Indonesia compared with similar countries

  • Indonesia's 21.1% is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 67.7%, 31% of the median. (56 countries reporting)
  • Indonesia's 21.1% is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 64.9%, 32% of the median. (28 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7
2010s 14.8% 0.0% 21.1% 10

Countries ranked near Indonesia

  1. 179 Micronesia (country) 25.9% compare
  2. 180 Bangladesh 25.0% compare
  3. 181 Malawi 22.4% compare
  4. 183 Solomon Islands 11.4% compare
  5. 184 Democratic Republic of Congo 9.4% compare
  6. 185 Burkina Faso 8.2% compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Indonesia

All data for Indonesia →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Indonesia?
Enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Indonesia was 21.1% in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score recorded in Indonesia?
The highest recorded value was 21.1% in 2013.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score recorded in Indonesia?
The lowest recorded value was 0.0% in 2003.
How does Indonesia rank for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
Indonesia ranks 182nd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Indonesia data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Indonesia. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-cost-percent-of-claim-score/indonesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-cost-percent-of-claim-score/indonesia/">Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Indonesia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 3,094 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.