Malawi vs Micronesia: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Malawi
22.4%
in 2019
Micronesia
25.9%
in 2019
Malawi rank
180th
Micronesia rank
178th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Malawi
- Micronesia
How they compare
Micronesia currently reports 25.9% against 22.4% in Malawi, a difference of 3.5%.
That makes Micronesia's figure about 1.2 times Malawi's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Micronesia has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 180th and Micronesia ranks 178th of 190 countries.
Micronesia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Micronesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 25.9% | 25.9% | Micronesia |
| 2010s | 15.7% | 25.9% | 10.2% | Micronesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Malawi or Micronesia?
- Micronesia, at 25.9% against 22.4% in Malawi as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Malawi and Micronesia?
- 3.5%, with Micronesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Micronesia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Malawi and Micronesia rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Malawi ranks 180th and Micronesia ranks 178th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.