Indonesia vs Micronesia, Federated States of: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Indonesia
- Micronesia, Federated States of
How they compare
Micronesia, Federated States of currently reports 25.9% against 21.1% in Indonesia, a difference of 4.8%.
That makes Micronesia, Federated States of's figure about 1.2 times Indonesia's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Micronesia, Federated States of has been ahead every year.
Indonesia ranks 181st and Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 178th of 190 countries.
Micronesia, Federated States of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Micronesia, Federated States of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 25.9% | 25.9% | Micronesia, Federated States of |
| 2010s | 14.8% | 25.9% | 11.1% | Micronesia, Federated States of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Indonesia or Micronesia, Federated States of?
- Micronesia, Federated States of, at 25.9% against 21.1% in Indonesia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Indonesia and Micronesia, Federated States of?
- 4.8%, with Micronesia, Federated States of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Micronesia, Federated States of?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Indonesia and Micronesia, Federated States of rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Indonesia ranks 181st and Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 178th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.