Benin vs Micronesia, Federated States of: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Benin
27.3%
in 2019
Micronesia, Federated States of
25.9%
in 2019
Benin rank
177th
Micronesia, Federated States of rank
178th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Benin
- Micronesia, Federated States of
How they compare
Benin currently reports 27.3% against 25.9% in Micronesia, Federated States of, a difference of 1.4%.
That makes Benin's figure about 1.1 times Micronesia, Federated States of's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Benin has been ahead every year.
Benin ranks 177th and Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 178th of 190 countries.
Benin has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Benin | Micronesia, Federated States of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.3% | 25.9% | 1.5% | Benin |
| 2010s | 27.3% | 25.9% | 1.5% | Benin |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Benin or Micronesia, Federated States of?
- Benin, at 27.3% against 25.9% in Micronesia, Federated States of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Benin and Micronesia, Federated States of?
- 1.4%, with Benin ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Micronesia, Federated States of?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Benin and Micronesia, Federated States of rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Benin ranks 177th and Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 178th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.