Eswatini vs Micronesia (Federated States of): Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Eswatini
37.0%
in 2019
Micronesia (Federated States of)
25.9%
in 2019
Eswatini rank
175th
Micronesia (Federated States of) rank
178th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Eswatini
- Micronesia (Federated States of)
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 37.0% against 25.9% in Micronesia (Federated States of), a difference of 11.1%.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.4 times Micronesia (Federated States of)'s.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 175th and Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 178th of 190 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Micronesia (Federated States of) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.0% | 25.9% | 11.1% | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 37.0% | 25.9% | 11.1% | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Eswatini or Micronesia (Federated States of)?
- Eswatini, at 37.0% against 25.9% in Micronesia (Federated States of) as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Eswatini and Micronesia (Federated States of)?
- 11.1%, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Micronesia (Federated States of)?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Eswatini and Micronesia (Federated States of) rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Eswatini ranks 175th and Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 178th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.