Micronesia vs Rwanda: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Micronesia
25.9%
in 2019
Rwanda
27.4%
in 2019
Micronesia rank
178th
Rwanda rank
176th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Micronesia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 27.4% against 25.9% in Micronesia, a difference of 1.5%.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Micronesia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Micronesia ahead.
Micronesia ranks 178th and Rwanda ranks 176th of 190 countries.
Micronesia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Micronesia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.9% | 9.6% | 16.3% | Micronesia |
| 2010s | 25.9% | 20.7% | 5.2% | Micronesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Micronesia or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 27.4% against 25.9% in Micronesia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Micronesia and Rwanda?
- 1.5%, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia and Rwanda?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Micronesia and Rwanda rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Micronesia ranks 178th and Rwanda ranks 176th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.