Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Rwanda
Rwanda: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score was 27.4% in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Rwanda, 2003–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2019, enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Rwanda stood at 27.4%. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 3.0% on the previous year and up 136.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Rwanda peaked at 27.4% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 4.5%, in 2003.
That places Rwanda 177th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Rwanda, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 4.5% | — |
| 2004 | 4.5% | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 11.6% | +157.5% |
| 2006 | 11.6% | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 11.6% | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 11.6% | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 11.6% | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 11.6% | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 11.6% | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 11.6% | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 11.6% | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 26.7% | +130.1% |
| 2015 | 26.7% | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 26.7% | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 26.7% | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 26.7% | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 27.4% | +3.0% |
Rwanda compared with similar countries
- Rwanda's 27.4% is below the median for low income countries, which is 61.5%, 45% of the median. (24 countries reporting)
- Rwanda's 27.4% is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 56.5%, 49% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.6% | 4.5% | 11.6% | 7 |
| 2010s | 20.7% | 11.6% | 27.4% | 10 |
Countries ranked near Rwanda
- 174 Mozambique 40.2% compare
- 175 Vanuatu 37.1% compare
- 176 Eswatini 37.0% compare
- 178 Benin 27.3% compare
- 179 Micronesia (country) 25.9% compare
- 180 Bangladesh 25.0% compare
More reference data data for Rwanda
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2282 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.9517 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.38 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1223 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.38 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.7651 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.9517 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 4.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 6.98 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.666 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Rwanda?
- Enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Rwanda was 27.4% in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score recorded in Rwanda?
- The highest recorded value was 27.4% in 2019.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score recorded in Rwanda?
- The lowest recorded value was 4.5% in 2003.
- How does Rwanda rank for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Rwanda ranks 177th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score rising or falling in Rwanda?
- Over the last ten years it is up 136.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Rwanda data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.