Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Eswatini

Eswatini: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score was 37.0% in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
37.0%
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
176th
of 191 countries
All-time high
37.0%
in 2005
All-time low
37.0%
in 2005
Years of data
15
2005–2019

Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Eswatini, 2005–2019

0102030402005201220192005: 372006: 372007: 372008: 372009: 372010: 372011: 372012: 372013: 372014: 372015: 372016: 372017: 372018: 372019: 37

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Eswatini recorded 37.0% for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in 2019. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Eswatini peaked at 37.0% in 2005 and was at its lowest, 37.0%, in 2005.

Eswatini ranks 176th of 191 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Eswatini, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Eswatini, 2005 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2005 37.0% —
2006 37.0% +0.0%
2007 37.0% +0.0%
2008 37.0% +0.0%
2009 37.0% +0.0%
2010 37.0% +0.0%
2011 37.0% +0.0%
2012 37.0% +0.0%
2013 37.0% +0.0%
2014 37.0% +0.0%
2015 37.0% +0.0%
2016 37.0% +0.0%
2017 37.0% +0.0%
2018 37.0% +0.0%
2019 37.0% +0.0%

Eswatini compared with similar countries

  • Eswatini's 37.0% is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 56.5%, 66% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
  • Eswatini's 37.0% is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 56.5%, 66% of the median. (48 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 37.0% 37.0% 37.0% 5
2010s 37.0% 37.0% 37.0% 10

Countries ranked near Eswatini

  1. 173 Congo 40.3% compare
  2. 174 Mozambique 40.2% compare
  3. 175 Vanuatu 37.1% compare
  4. 177 Rwanda 27.4% compare
  5. 178 Benin 27.3% compare
  6. 179 Micronesia (country) 25.9% compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Eswatini

All data for Eswatini →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Eswatini?
Enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Eswatini was 37.0% in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score recorded in Eswatini?
The highest recorded value was 37.0% in 2005.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score recorded in Eswatini?
The lowest recorded value was 37.0% in 2005.
How does Eswatini rank for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
Eswatini ranks 176th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score rising or falling in Eswatini?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Eswatini data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Eswatini. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-cost-percent-of-claim-score/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-cost-percent-of-claim-score/eswatini/">Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Eswatini</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 3,094 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.