Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Marshall Islands
Marshall Islands: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score was 33.33 in 2013. ▬ Flat
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Marshall Islands, 2005–2013
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2013, protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Marshall Islands stood at 33.33. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Marshall Islands peaked at 33.33 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 33.33, in 2005.
Marshall Islands ranks 153rd of 191 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Marshall Islands, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 33.33 | — |
| 2006 | 33.33 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 33.33 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 33.33 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 33.33 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 33.33 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 33.33 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 33.33 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 33.33 | +0.0% |
Marshall Islands compared with similar countries
- Marshall Islands's 33.33 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 53.33, 62% of the median. (56 countries reporting)
- Marshall Islands's 33.33 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 58.33, 57% of the median. (28 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.33 | 33.33 | 33.33 | 5 |
| 2010s | 33.33 | 33.33 | 33.33 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Marshall Islands
- 153 Barbados 33.33 compare
- 153 Benin 33.33 compare
- 153 Burkina Faso 33.33 compare
- 153 Chad 33.33 compare
- 153 Comoros 33.33 compare
- 153 Congo 33.33 compare
- 153 Cote d'Ivoire 33.33 compare
- 153 Gabon 33.33 compare
- 153 Guatemala 33.33 compare
- 153 Guinea 33.33 compare
- 153 Mali 33.33 compare
- 153 Niger 33.33 compare
- 153 Sao Tome and Principe 33.33 compare
- 153 Togo 33.33 compare
More reference data data for Marshall Islands
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 0 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture 0 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 0 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 0 (2019)
- Political regime fh 2 (2025)
- Universal right to vote in practice 2 (2025)
- Share of children immunized dtp3 85 (2025)
- Civil liberties rating fh 1 (2025)
- Universal suffrage men lexical 1 (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Marshall Islands?
- Protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Marshall Islands was 33.33 in 2013, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Marshall Islands?
- The highest recorded value was 33.33 in 2005.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Marshall Islands?
- The lowest recorded value was 33.33 in 2005.
- How does Marshall Islands rank for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Marshall Islands ranks 153rd out of 191 countries with data for 2013.
- Is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score rising or falling in Marshall Islands?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Marshall Islands data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.