Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Mali
Mali: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score was 33.33 in 2013. ▬ Flat
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Mali, 2005–2013
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2013, protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Mali stood at 33.33. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Mali peaked at 33.33 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 33.33, in 2005.
That places Mali 153rd out of 191 countries with data for 2013, putting it in the bottom quarter.
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Mali, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 33.33 | — |
| 2006 | 33.33 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 33.33 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 33.33 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 33.33 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 33.33 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 33.33 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 33.33 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 33.33 | +0.0% |
Mali compared with similar countries
- Mali's 33.33 is below the median for low income countries, which is 35, 95% of the median. (24 countries reporting)
- Mali's 33.33 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 38.33, 87% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.33 | 33.33 | 33.33 | 5 |
| 2010s | 33.33 | 33.33 | 33.33 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Mali
- 153 Barbados 33.33 compare
- 153 Benin 33.33 compare
- 153 Burkina Faso 33.33 compare
- 153 Chad 33.33 compare
- 153 Comoros 33.33 compare
- 153 Congo 33.33 compare
- 153 Cote d'Ivoire 33.33 compare
- 153 Gabon 33.33 compare
- 153 Guatemala 33.33 compare
- 153 Guinea 33.33 compare
- 153 Marshall Islands 33.33 compare
- 153 Niger 33.33 compare
- 153 Sao Tome and Principe 33.33 compare
- 153 Togo 33.33 compare
More reference data data for Mali
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.3081 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 9.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 11.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.4025 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 11.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.4728 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 39.47 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 47.61 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.19 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Mali?
- Protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Mali was 33.33 in 2013, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Mali?
- The highest recorded value was 33.33 in 2005.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Mali?
- The lowest recorded value was 33.33 in 2005.
- How does Mali rank for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Mali ranks 153rd out of 191 countries with data for 2013.
- Is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score rising or falling in Mali?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Mali data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.