Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Guinea
Guinea: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score was 33.33 in 2013. ▬ Flat
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Guinea, 2005–2013
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
Guinea recorded 33.33 for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in 2013. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Guinea peaked at 33.33 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 33.33, in 2005.
Guinea ranks 153rd of 191 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Guinea, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 33.33 | — |
| 2006 | 33.33 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 33.33 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 33.33 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 33.33 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 33.33 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 33.33 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 33.33 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 33.33 | +0.0% |
Guinea compared with similar countries
- Guinea's 33.33 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 46.67, 71% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Guinea's 33.33 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 38.33, 87% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.33 | 33.33 | 33.33 | 5 |
| 2010s | 33.33 | 33.33 | 33.33 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Guinea
- 153 Barbados 33.33 compare
- 153 Benin 33.33 compare
- 153 Burkina Faso 33.33 compare
- 153 Chad 33.33 compare
- 153 Comoros 33.33 compare
- 153 Congo 33.33 compare
- 153 Cote d'Ivoire 33.33 compare
- 153 Gabon 33.33 compare
- 153 Guatemala 33.33 compare
- 153 Mali 33.33 compare
- 153 Marshall Islands 33.33 compare
- 153 Niger 33.33 compare
- 153 Sao Tome and Principe 33.33 compare
- 153 Togo 33.33 compare
More reference data data for Guinea
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.111 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.56 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.05 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2883 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.05 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.3722 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2242 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 13.37 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 16 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.57 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Guinea?
- Protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Guinea was 33.33 in 2013, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Guinea?
- The highest recorded value was 33.33 in 2005.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Guinea?
- The lowest recorded value was 33.33 in 2005.
- How does Guinea rank for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Guinea ranks 153rd out of 191 countries with data for 2013.
- Is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score rising or falling in Guinea?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Guinea data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.