Congo vs Marshall Islands: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Congo
33.33
in 2013
Marshall Islands
33.33
in 2013
Congo rank
151st
Marshall Islands rank
151st
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Congo
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Congo currently reports 33.33 against 33.33 in Marshall Islands, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Marshall Islands has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 151st and Marshall Islands ranks 151st of 188 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Marshall Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.33 | 33.33 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 33.33 | 33.33 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Congo or Marshall Islands?
- Congo, at 33.33 against 33.33 in Marshall Islands as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Congo and Marshall Islands?
- 0, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Marshall Islands?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Congo and Marshall Islands rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Congo ranks 151st and Marshall Islands ranks 151st of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.