Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Côte d'Ivoire

Côte d'Ivoire: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score was 33.33 in 2013. ▬ Flat

Latest (2013)
33.33
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
152nd
of 190 countries
All-time high
33.33
in 2005
All-time low
33.33
in 2005
Years of data
9
2005–2013

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Côte d'Ivoire, 2005–2013

01020302005200920132005: 33.32006: 33.32007: 33.32008: 33.32009: 33.32010: 33.32011: 33.32012: 33.32013: 33.3

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2013, protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Côte d'Ivoire stood at 33.33. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Côte d'Ivoire peaked at 33.33 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 33.33, in 2005.

Côte d'Ivoire ranks 152nd of 190 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 33.33 33.33 33.33 5
2010s 33.33 33.33 33.33 4

Countries ranked near Côte d'Ivoire

  1. 152 Barbados 33.33 compare
  2. 152 Benin 33.33 compare
  3. 152 Burkina Faso 33.33 compare
  4. 152 Chad 33.33 compare
  5. 152 Comoros, Union of the 33.33 compare
  6. 152 Congo, Republic of 33.33 compare
  7. 152 Gabon 33.33 compare
  8. 152 Guatemala 33.33 compare
  9. 152 Guinea 33.33 compare
  10. 152 Mali 33.33 compare
  11. 152 Marshall Islands, Republic of the 33.33 compare
  12. 152 Niger 33.33 compare
  13. 152 São Tomé and Príncipe, Democratic Republic of 33.33 compare
  14. 152 Togo 33.33 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Côte d'Ivoire

All data for Côte d'Ivoire →

Frequently asked questions

What is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Côte d'Ivoire?
Protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Côte d'Ivoire was 33.33 in 2013, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Côte d'Ivoire?
The highest recorded value was 33.33 in 2005.
What is the lowest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Côte d'Ivoire?
The lowest recorded value was 33.33 in 2005.
How does Côte d'Ivoire rank for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 152nd out of 190 countries with data for 2013.
Is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score rising or falling in Côte d'Ivoire?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Côte d'Ivoire data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Côte d'Ivoire. Statizoid. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-db06-14-methodology-score/cote-d-ivoire/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-db06-14-methodology-score/cote-d-ivoire/">Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Côte d'Ivoire</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,710 data points, 2005–2013
Last refreshed

The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.