Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Barbados
Barbados: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score was 33.33 in 2013. ▬ Flat
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Barbados, 2005–2013
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2013, protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Barbados stood at 33.33. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Barbados peaked at 33.33 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 33.33, in 2005.
That places Barbados 153rd out of 191 countries with data for 2013, putting it in the bottom quarter.
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Barbados, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 33.33 | — |
| 2006 | 33.33 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 33.33 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 33.33 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 33.33 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 33.33 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 33.33 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 33.33 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 33.33 | +0.0% |
Barbados compared with similar countries
- Barbados's 33.33 is below the median for high income countries, which is 56.67, 59% of the median. (62 countries reporting)
- Barbados's 33.33 is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 53.33, 62% of the median. (33 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.33 | 33.33 | 33.33 | 5 |
| 2010s | 33.33 | 33.33 | 33.33 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Barbados
- 153 Benin 33.33 compare
- 153 Burkina Faso 33.33 compare
- 153 Chad 33.33 compare
- 153 Comoros 33.33 compare
- 153 Congo 33.33 compare
- 153 Cote d'Ivoire 33.33 compare
- 153 Gabon 33.33 compare
- 153 Guatemala 33.33 compare
- 153 Guinea 33.33 compare
- 153 Mali 33.33 compare
- 153 Marshall Islands 33.33 compare
- 153 Niger 33.33 compare
- 153 Sao Tome and Principe 33.33 compare
- 153 Togo 33.33 compare
More reference data data for Barbados
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0268 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0217 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0558 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0558 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.09 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0377 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.118 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.2758 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0001 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Barbados?
- Protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Barbados was 33.33 in 2013, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Barbados?
- The highest recorded value was 33.33 in 2005.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Barbados?
- The lowest recorded value was 33.33 in 2005.
- How does Barbados rank for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Barbados ranks 153rd out of 191 countries with data for 2013.
- Is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score rising or falling in Barbados?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Barbados data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.