Marshall Islands vs Sao Tome and Principe: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Marshall Islands
33.33
in 2013
Sao Tome and Principe
33.33
in 2013
Marshall Islands rank
153rd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
153rd
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Marshall Islands
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Marshall Islands currently reports 33.33 against 33.33 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.
Marshall Islands ranks 153rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 153rd of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Marshall Islands | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.33 | 33.33 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 33.33 | 33.33 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Marshall Islands or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Marshall Islands, at 33.33 against 33.33 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Marshall Islands and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0, with Marshall Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Marshall Islands and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Marshall Islands ranks 153rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 153rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.