Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Chad
Chad: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score was 33.33 in 2013. ▬ Flat
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Chad, 2005–2013
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Chad is 33.33, measured in 2013. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Chad peaked at 33.33 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 33.33, in 2005.
Chad ranks 153rd of 191 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Chad, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 33.33 | — |
| 2006 | 33.33 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 33.33 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 33.33 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 33.33 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 33.33 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 33.33 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 33.33 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 33.33 | +0.0% |
Chad compared with similar countries
- Chad's 33.33 is below the median for low income countries, which is 35, 95% of the median. (24 countries reporting)
- Chad's 33.33 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 38.33, 87% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.33 | 33.33 | 33.33 | 5 |
| 2010s | 33.33 | 33.33 | 33.33 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Chad
- 153 Barbados 33.33 compare
- 153 Benin 33.33 compare
- 153 Burkina Faso 33.33 compare
- 153 Comoros 33.33 compare
- 153 Congo 33.33 compare
- 153 Cote d'Ivoire 33.33 compare
- 153 Gabon 33.33 compare
- 153 Guatemala 33.33 compare
- 153 Guinea 33.33 compare
- 153 Mali 33.33 compare
- 153 Marshall Islands 33.33 compare
- 153 Niger 33.33 compare
- 153 Sao Tome and Principe 33.33 compare
- 153 Togo 33.33 compare
More reference data data for Chad
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.3078 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 13.52 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1797 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 14.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.5525 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 58.55 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 61.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.9785 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Chad?
- Protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Chad was 33.33 in 2013, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Chad?
- The highest recorded value was 33.33 in 2005.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Chad?
- The lowest recorded value was 33.33 in 2005.
- How does Chad rank for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Chad ranks 153rd out of 191 countries with data for 2013.
- Is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score rising or falling in Chad?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Chad data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.