Mali vs Marshall Islands, Republic of the: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Mali
33.33
in 2013
Marshall Islands, Republic of the
33.33
in 2013
Mali rank
152nd
Marshall Islands, Republic of the rank
152nd
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Mali
- Marshall Islands, Republic of the
How they compare
Mali currently reports 33.33 against 33.33 in Marshall Islands, Republic of the, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Marshall Islands, Republic of the has been ahead every year.
Mali ranks 152nd and Marshall Islands, Republic of the ranks 152nd of 190 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Marshall Islands, Republic of the | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.33 | 33.33 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 33.33 | 33.33 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Mali or Marshall Islands, Republic of the?
- Mali, at 33.33 against 33.33 in Marshall Islands, Republic of the as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Mali and Marshall Islands, Republic of the?
- 0, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Marshall Islands, Republic of the?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Mali and Marshall Islands, Republic of the rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Mali ranks 152nd and Marshall Islands, Republic of the ranks 152nd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.