Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at in Latvia
Latvia: Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at was 0.8347 LPIA in 2018. ▬ Flat
Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at in Latvia, 2000–2018
Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Measured in LPIA.
Analysis
Latvia recorded 0.8347 LPIA for proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at in 2018.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 5.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at in Latvia peaked at 0.9308 LPIA in 2006 and was at its lowest, 0.7637 LPIA, in 2000.
Latvia ranks 19th of 39 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at in Latvia, year by year
| Year | LPIA | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 0.7637 LPIA | — |
| 2003 | 0.8677 LPIA | +13.6% |
| 2006 | 0.9308 LPIA | +7.3% |
| 2009 | 0.8835 LPIA | -5.1% |
| 2012 | 0.8791 LPIA | -0.5% |
| 2018 | 0.8347 LPIA | -5.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.8614 LPIA | 0.7637 LPIA | 0.9308 LPIA | 4 |
| 2010s | 0.8569 LPIA | 0.8347 LPIA | 0.8791 LPIA | 2 |
Countries ranked near Latvia
- 16 Turkey 0.8984 LPIA compare
- 17 United States 0.8659 LPIA compare
- 18 Luxembourg 0.8637 LPIA compare
- 20 Russia 0.8333 LPIA compare
- 21 Israel 0.8245 LPIA compare
- 22 New Zealand 0.8236 LPIA compare
More reference data data for Latvia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.128 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0503 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.4657 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0673 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.4657 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4291 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2986 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.2679 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3666 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at in Latvia?
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at in Latvia was 0.8347 LPIA in 2018, according to UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
- What is the highest proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at recorded in Latvia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.9308 LPIA in 2006.
- What is the lowest proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at recorded in Latvia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.7637 LPIA in 2000.
- How does Latvia rank for proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at?
- Latvia ranks 19th out of 39 countries with data for 2018.
- Is proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at rising or falling in Latvia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 5.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Latvia data come from?
- The figures come from UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as part of Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, adjusted location parity index (LPIA). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Adjusted Location Parity Index (LPIA) is calculated by dividing the rural value for the indicator by the urban value for the indicator. If the resulting value exceeds 1, the ratio is inverted and subtracted from 2. The adjusted location parity index is symmetrical around 1 and lies in the range 0-2. An adjusted LPI equal to 1 indicates parity between rural and urban locations. In general, a value less than 1 indicates disparity in favor of urban locations and a value greater than 1 indicates disparity in favor of rural locations. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute for Statistics: http://uis.unesco.org/