Latvia vs New Zealand: Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at
Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at over time
- Latvia
- New Zealand
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.8347 LPIA against 0.8236 LPIA in New Zealand, a difference of 0.0111 LPIA.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2000 it was New Zealand ahead.
Latvia ranks 19th and New Zealand ranks 22nd of 39 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.8614 LPIA | 0.9639 LPIA | 0.1025 LPIA | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 0.8569 LPIA | 0.8525 LPIA | 0.0044 LPIA | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at, Latvia or New Zealand?
- Latvia, at 0.8347 LPIA against 0.8236 LPIA in New Zealand as of 2018.
- What is the difference in proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at between Latvia and New Zealand?
- 0.0111 LPIA, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and New Zealand?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2018.
- How do Latvia and New Zealand rank globally for proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at?
- Latvia ranks 19th and New Zealand ranks 22nd of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, adjusted location parity index (LPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Adjusted Location Parity Index (LPIA) is calculated by dividing the rural value for the indicator by the urban value for the indicator. If the resulting value exceeds 1, the ratio is inverted and subtracted from 2. The adjusted location parity index is symmetrical around 1 and lies in the range 0-2. An adjusted LPI equal to 1 indicates parity between rural and urban locations. In general, a value less than 1 indicates disparity in favor of urban locations and a value greater than 1 indicates disparity in favor of rural locations. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute for Statistics: http://uis.unesco.org/