Latvia vs Luxembourg: Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at
Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at over time
- Latvia
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 0.8637 LPIA against 0.8347 LPIA in Latvia, a difference of 0.029 LPIA.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Latvia ranks 19th and Luxembourg ranks 18th of 39 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Luxembourg in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.8614 LPIA | 0.9357 LPIA | 0.0743 LPIA | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 0.8791 LPIA | 0.8637 LPIA | 0.0154 LPIA | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at, Latvia or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 0.8637 LPIA against 0.8347 LPIA in Latvia as of 2012.
- What is the difference in proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at between Latvia and Luxembourg?
- 0.029 LPIA, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Luxembourg?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2012.
- How do Latvia and Luxembourg rank globally for proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at?
- Latvia ranks 19th and Luxembourg ranks 18th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, adjusted location parity index (LPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Adjusted Location Parity Index (LPIA) is calculated by dividing the rural value for the indicator by the urban value for the indicator. If the resulting value exceeds 1, the ratio is inverted and subtracted from 2. The adjusted location parity index is symmetrical around 1 and lies in the range 0-2. An adjusted LPI equal to 1 indicates parity between rural and urban locations. In general, a value less than 1 indicates disparity in favor of urban locations and a value greater than 1 indicates disparity in favor of rural locations. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute for Statistics: http://uis.unesco.org/