How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Latvia?

5 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2018.

Where does this data come from?

UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, adjusted location parity index (LPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Israel vs Latvia: Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at

Israel

0.8245 LPIA

in 2018

Latvia

0.8347 LPIA

in 2018

Israel rank

21st

Latvia rank

19th

Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at over time

Israel
Latvia

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 0.8347 LPIA against 0.8245 LPIA in Israel, a difference of 0.0102 LPIA.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Israel ahead.

Israel ranks 21st and Latvia ranks 19th of 39 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Israel	Latvia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.894 LPIA	0.8594 LPIA	0.0346 LPIA	Israel
2010s	0.8188 LPIA	0.8569 LPIA	0.0381 LPIA	Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at, Israel or Latvia?: Latvia, at 0.8347 LPIA against 0.8245 LPIA in Israel as of 2018.
What is the difference in proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at between Israel and Latvia?: 0.0102 LPIA, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Latvia?: 5 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2018.
How do Israel and Latvia rank globally for proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at?: Israel ranks 21st and Latvia ranks 19th of 39 countries.
Where does this data come from?: UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, adjusted location parity index (LPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Israel vs Latvia: Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-students-at-the-end-of-lower-secondary-achieving-at-least-a-minimum-2/israel/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-students-at-the-end-of-lower-secondary-achieving-at-least-a-minimum-2/israel/latvia/">Israel vs Latvia: Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)
Unit: LPIA
Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 39 places, 219 data points, 1995–2018
Last refreshed: 21 August 2026

The Adjusted Location Parity Index (LPIA) is calculated by dividing the rural value for the indicator by the urban value for the indicator. If the resulting value exceeds 1, the ratio is inverted and subtracted from 2. The adjusted location parity index is symmetrical around 1 and lies in the range 0-2. An adjusted LPI equal to 1 indicates parity between rural and urban locations. In general, a value less than 1 indicates disparity in favor of urban locations and a value greater than 1 indicates disparity in favor of rural locations. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute for Statistics: http://uis.unesco.org/