Latvia vs Russian Federation: Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at
Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at over time
- Latvia
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.8347 LPIA against 0.8333 LPIA in Russian Federation, a difference of 0.0014 LPIA.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Latvia ranks 19th and Russian Federation ranks 20th of 39 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.8614 LPIA | 0.8392 LPIA | 0.0222 LPIA | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.8569 LPIA | 0.8568 LPIA | 0.0001 LPIA | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at, Latvia or Russian Federation?
- Latvia, at 0.8347 LPIA against 0.8333 LPIA in Russian Federation as of 2018.
- What is the difference in proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at between Latvia and Russian Federation?
- 0.0014 LPIA, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Russian Federation?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2018.
- How do Latvia and Russian Federation rank globally for proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at?
- Latvia ranks 19th and Russian Federation ranks 20th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, adjusted location parity index (LPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Adjusted Location Parity Index (LPIA) is calculated by dividing the rural value for the indicator by the urban value for the indicator. If the resulting value exceeds 1, the ratio is inverted and subtracted from 2. The adjusted location parity index is symmetrical around 1 and lies in the range 0-2. An adjusted LPI equal to 1 indicates parity between rural and urban locations. In general, a value less than 1 indicates disparity in favor of urban locations and a value greater than 1 indicates disparity in favor of rural locations. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute for Statistics: http://uis.unesco.org/