PISA: Male 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Below Level 1 by country

Percentage of 15-year-old male students below the lowest proficiency level (scoring 358 or below) on the PISA mathematics scale. Students below Level 1 may be able to perform very direct and straightforward mathematical tasks, such as reading a single value from a well-labeled chart or table where the labels on the...

Countries reporting
53
Highest
45.5%
Tunisia
Lowest
1.1%
Macao
Median
8.9%
Years covered
16
2003–2018
Data points
303

What the numbers show

PISA: Male 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Below Level 1 is currently reported for 53 countries. The highest value is 45.5% in Tunisia; the lowest is 1.1% in Macao.

The median across all reporting countries is 8.9%, and the mean is 13.9%.

The gap between the highest and lowest reporting country is a factor of about 41.

Over the past decade 34 countries rose and 19 fell. The largest increase was in Finland (up 163.9%), and the largest decrease in Macao (down 59.9%).

PISA: Male 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Below Le: full country ranking

#Country LatestYear 10-year changeTrend
1 Tunisia 45.5% 2015 up 1.3% falling
2 Indonesia 43.3% 2018 down 2.8% flat
3 Brazil 39.9% 2018 up 16.7% falling
4 Qatar 37.3% 2018 down 28.9% falling
5 Argentina 37.3% 2018 up 6.8% falling
6 Jordan 33.1% 2018 down 6.0% flat
7 Colombia 31.4% 2018 up 2.6% falling
8 Thailand 28.9% 2018 up 27.5% rising
9 Uruguay 24.2% 2018 up 12.3% rising
10 Chile 24.2% 2018 up 31.7% rising
11 Mexico 24.1% 2018 up 20.3% falling
12 Bulgaria 22.9% 2018 down 9.9% falling
13 Romania 22.7% 2018 up 13.5% falling
14 Israel 21.4% 2018 down 1.6% falling
15 Montenegro 19.5% 2018 down 30.2% falling
16 Serbia 18.5% 2018 up 10.3% falling
17 Greece 16.6% 2018 up 51.2% rising
18 Turkey 13.8% 2018 down 16.8% falling
19 Luxembourg 10.6% 2018 up 14.1% rising
20 Croatia 10.6% 2018 down 8.9% rising
21 Slovakia 10.5% 2018 up 50.3% rising
22 United States 10.4% 2018 up 53.7% rising
23 Lithuania 10.4% 2018 up 4.6% rising
24 Portugal 9.4% 2018 up 16.8% falling
25 Iceland 9.3% 2018 up 47.2% rising
26 Hungary 8.9% 2018 up 10.7% rising
27 Italy 8.9% 2018 up 2.6% falling
28 Spain 8.7% 2018 up 9.8% falling
29 France 8.1% 2018 down 11.4% rising
30 Norway 8.0% 2018 up 36.0% flat
31 Australia 8.0% 2018 up 52.3% rising
32 Germany 7.7% 2018 up 36.9% falling
33 New Zealand 7.6% 2018 up 35.7% rising
34 Russia 7.1% 2018 down 29.6% falling
35 Austria 7.0% 2018 up 8.0% rising
36 Czechia 6.5% 2018 down 3.8% rising
37 Sweden 6.4% 2018 down 24.0% rising
38 Belgium 6.4% 2018 up 5.4% falling
39 United Kingdom 6.1% 2018 up 14.7% rising
40 South Korea 5.6% 2018 up 126.4% rising
41 Slovenia 5.1% 2018 down 26.8% falling
42 Canada 5.1% 2018 up 65.7% rising
43 Netherlands 4.7% 2018 up 119.0% rising
44 Poland 4.6% 2018 down 30.7% falling
45 Finland 4.5% 2018 up 163.9% rising
46 Latvia 4.4% 2018 down 31.1% falling
47 Switzerland 4.4% 2018 up 12.3% rising
48 Denmark 4.2% 2018 up 7.4% flat
49 Ireland 4.0% 2018 down 48.4% falling
50 Hong Kong 3.5% 2018 up 32.4% falling
51 Japan 3.2% 2018 down 26.7% falling
52 Estonia 2.2% 2018 down 16.4% falling
53 Macao 1.1% 2018 down 59.9% falling

About this data

Indicator
PISA: Male 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Below Level 1
Source
OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
53 places, 303 data points, 2003–2018
Last refreshed

Percentage of 15-year-old male students below the lowest proficiency level (scoring 358 or below) on the PISA mathematics scale. Students below Level 1 may be able to perform very direct and straightforward mathematical tasks, such as reading a single value from a well-labeled chart or table where the labels on the chart match the words in the stimulus and question, so that the selection criteria are clear and the relationship between the chart and the aspects of the context depicted are evident, and performing arithmetic calculations with whole numbers by following clear and well-defined instructions. Data reflects country performance in the stated year according to PISA reports, but may not be comparable across years or countries. Consult the PISA website for more detailed information: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/