Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Mongolia
Mongolia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was 0.2353 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▼ Falling
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Mongolia, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
Mongolia recorded 0.2353 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 for voice and accountability - governance estimate in 2025.
The figure is up 13.0% on the previous year and down 12.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Mongolia peaked at 0.4958 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1998 and was at its lowest, 0.1417 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2012.
That places Mongolia 89th out of 208 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 27 years of available data.
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Mongolia, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.4087 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | 0.4958 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +21.3% |
| 2000 | 0.2861 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -42.3% |
| 2002 | 0.3335 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +16.6% |
| 2003 | 0.375 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +12.4% |
| 2004 | 0.3532 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.8% |
| 2005 | 0.2801 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -20.7% |
| 2006 | 0.2877 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.7% |
| 2007 | 0.3226 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +12.1% |
| 2008 | 0.2756 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -14.6% |
| 2009 | 0.2607 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.4% |
| 2010 | 0.284 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +8.9% |
| 2011 | 0.2598 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -8.5% |
| 2012 | 0.1417 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -45.4% |
| 2013 | 0.1967 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +38.8% |
| 2014 | 0.2757 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +40.1% |
| 2015 | 0.2686 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.6% |
| 2016 | 0.3057 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +13.8% |
| 2017 | 0.2898 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.2% |
| 2018 | 0.2668 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.9% |
| 2019 | 0.2637 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.2% |
| 2020 | 0.278 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +5.4% |
| 2021 | 0.2355 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -15.3% |
| 2022 | 0.2203 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.5% |
| 2023 | 0.2416 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +9.7% |
| 2024 | 0.2083 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -13.8% |
| 2025 | 0.2353 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +13.0% |
Mongolia compared with similar countries
- Mongolia's 0.2353 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is -0.0542 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (59 countries reporting)
- Mongolia's 0.2353 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 0.334 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 70% of the median. (36 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4522 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4087 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4958 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.3083 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2607 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.375 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.2552 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1417 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3057 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.2365 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2083 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.278 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Mongolia
More reference data data for Mongolia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.8173 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 3.37 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 4.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0069 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 4.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 3.16 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 12.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 18.89 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0378 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in Mongolia?
- Voice and accountability - governance estimate in Mongolia was 0.2353 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Mongolia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.4958 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1998.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Mongolia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1417 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2012.
- How does Mongolia rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Mongolia ranks 89th out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
- Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in Mongolia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 12.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Mongolia data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.