Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Bhutan
Bhutan: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was 0.2113 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Bhutan, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
Bhutan recorded 0.2113 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 for voice and accountability - governance estimate in 2025.
The figure is up 73.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Bhutan peaked at 0.2451 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2019 and was at its lowest, -1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 1996.
Bhutan ranks 91st of 208 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Bhutan, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8% |
| 2000 | -1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.6% |
| 2002 | -1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.6% |
| 2003 | -1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.4% |
| 2004 | -1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -14.6% |
| 2005 | -0.6913 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -31.3% |
| 2006 | -0.7711 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +11.5% |
| 2007 | -0.5864 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -23.9% |
| 2008 | -0.2809 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -52.1% |
| 2009 | -0.2097 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -25.4% |
| 2010 | -0.1949 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.0% |
| 2011 | -0.206 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +5.7% |
| 2012 | -0.0149 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -92.8% |
| 2013 | 0.0704 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -571.3% |
| 2014 | 0.1058 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +50.3% |
| 2015 | 0.1218 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +15.2% |
| 2016 | 0.1184 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.8% |
| 2017 | 0.1182 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2% |
| 2018 | 0.2295 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +94.2% |
| 2019 | 0.2451 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +6.8% |
| 2020 | 0.1798 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -26.7% |
| 2021 | 0.1835 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.1% |
| 2022 | 0.1138 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -38.0% |
| 2023 | 0.118 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.6% |
| 2024 | 0.2112 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +79.1% |
| 2025 | 0.2113 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.0% |
Bhutan compared with similar countries
- Bhutan's 0.2113 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is -0.7209 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (47 countries reporting)
- Bhutan's 0.2113 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for South Asia, which is -0.1602 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (6 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Bhutan changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | +571.3% | -0.0149 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0704 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -0.7875 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2097 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.0593 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.206 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2451 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.1696 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1138 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2113 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Bhutan
More reference data data for Bhutan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0217 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0671 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.1192 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0167 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.1192 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0727 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0153 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3489 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.5881 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0909 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in Bhutan?
- Voice and accountability - governance estimate in Bhutan was 0.2113 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Bhutan?
- The highest recorded value was 0.2451 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2019.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Bhutan?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1996.
- How does Bhutan rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Bhutan ranks 91st out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
- Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in Bhutan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 73.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Bhutan data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.