Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Bhutan
Bhutan: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate was 0.4011 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Bhutan, 1996–2024
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
Bhutan recorded 0.4011 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 for voice and accountability - governance estimate in 2024.
The figure is up 30.0% on the previous year and up 95.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Bhutan peaked at 0.4302 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2019 and was at its lowest, -0.9377 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2002.
Bhutan ranks 71st of 207 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Bhutan, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -0.9023 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -0.8921 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.1% |
| 2000 | -0.8503 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.7% |
| 2002 | -0.9377 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +10.3% |
| 2003 | -0.9127 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.7% |
| 2004 | -0.8495 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.9% |
| 2005 | -0.5247 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -38.2% |
| 2006 | -0.6184 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +17.9% |
| 2007 | -0.4488 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -27.4% |
| 2008 | -0.1895 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -57.8% |
| 2009 | -0.1562 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -17.6% |
| 2010 | -0.1491 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.5% |
| 2011 | -0.1627 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +9.1% |
| 2012 | 0.0959 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -159.0% |
| 2013 | 0.1957 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +104.0% |
| 2014 | 0.205 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.8% |
| 2015 | 0.2206 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +7.6% |
| 2016 | 0.2162 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.0% |
| 2017 | 0.2186 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.1% |
| 2018 | 0.409 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +87.1% |
| 2019 | 0.4302 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +5.2% |
| 2020 | 0.3372 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -21.6% |
| 2021 | 0.3423 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.5% |
| 2022 | 0.266 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -22.3% |
| 2023 | 0.3084 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +15.9% |
| 2024 | 0.4011 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +30.0% |
Bhutan compared with similar countries
- Bhutan's 0.4011 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is -0.7733 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (47 countries reporting)
- Bhutan's 0.4011 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for South Asia, which is -0.1025 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (6 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Bhutan changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | +159.0% | -0.1627 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0959 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.8972 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9023 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8921 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -0.6098 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9377 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1562 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.168 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1627 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4302 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.331 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.266 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4011 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Bhutan
- 68 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0.4599 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 69 Panama 0.4411 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 70 Trinidad and Tobago 0.4063 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 72 Montenegro 0.391 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 73 Romania 0.3874 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 74 Argentina 0.3856 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
More reference data data for Bhutan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0217 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0671 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.1192 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0167 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.1192 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0727 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0153 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3489 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.5881 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0909 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in Bhutan?
- Voice and accountability - governance estimate in Bhutan was 0.4011 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Bhutan?
- The highest recorded value was 0.4302 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2019.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Bhutan?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.9377 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2002.
- How does Bhutan rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Bhutan ranks 71st out of 207 countries with data for 2024.
- Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in Bhutan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 95.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Bhutan data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.