Mongolia vs Suriname: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Mongolia
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 0.2378 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.2353 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Mongolia, a difference of 0.0025 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 89th and Suriname ranks 88th of 208 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4522 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1224 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3298 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Mongolia |
| 2000s | 0.3083 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4722 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1639 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Suriname |
| 2010s | 0.2552 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3486 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0933 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Suriname |
| 2020s | 0.2365 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2466 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0101 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Mongolia or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 0.2378 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.2353 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Mongolia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Mongolia and Suriname?
- 0.0025 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Suriname?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Mongolia and Suriname rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Mongolia ranks 89th and Suriname ranks 88th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.