Bhutan vs Mongolia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Bhutan
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 0.2353 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.2113 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Bhutan, a difference of 0.024 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Bhutan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Mongolia ahead.
Bhutan ranks 91st and Mongolia ranks 89th of 208 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4522 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.67 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Mongolia |
| 2000s | -0.7875 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3083 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 0.0593 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2552 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1959 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 0.1696 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2365 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0669 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Bhutan or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 0.2353 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.2113 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Bhutan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Bhutan and Mongolia?
- 0.024 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Mongolia?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Bhutan and Mongolia rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Bhutan ranks 91st and Mongolia ranks 89th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.