Moldova vs Mongolia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Moldova
- Mongolia
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 0.2627 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.2353 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Mongolia, a difference of 0.0274 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That makes Moldova's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Mongolia ahead.
Moldova ranks 87th and Mongolia ranks 89th of 208 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Moldova | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.217 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4522 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6692 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Mongolia |
| 2000s | -0.3159 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3083 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6242 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 0.0351 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2552 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2202 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 0.1958 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2365 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0407 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Moldova or Mongolia?
- Moldova, at 0.2627 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.2353 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Mongolia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Moldova and Mongolia?
- 0.0274 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Mongolia?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Moldova and Mongolia rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Moldova ranks 87th and Mongolia ranks 89th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.