Belize vs Mongolia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Belize
0.104 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Mongolia
0.1269 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Belize rank
95th
Mongolia rank
93rd

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Belize
  • Mongolia
00.20.40.60.81199620102024

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 0.1269 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.104 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Belize, a difference of 0.0229 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.2 times Belize's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Belize ahead.

Belize ranks 95th and Mongolia ranks 93rd of 207 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 3 and Mongolia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belize Mongolia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.852 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4026 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4494 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Belize
2000s 0.6953 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2544 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4409 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Belize
2010s 0.4042 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1649 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2393 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Belize
2020s 0.0993 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1513 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.052 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Belize or Mongolia?
Mongolia, at 0.1269 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.104 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Belize as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Belize and Mongolia?
0.0229 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Mongolia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Belize and Mongolia rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Belize ranks 95th and Mongolia ranks 93rd of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belize vs Mongolia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/belize/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/belize/mongolia/">Belize vs Mongolia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 5,285 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.