Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Moldova
Moldova: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate was 0.2837 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Moldova, 1996–2024
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
Moldova recorded 0.2837 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 for voice and accountability - governance estimate in 2024. That is the highest value across all 26 years on record.
That represents a change of up 7.9% on the previous year and up 941.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Moldova peaked at 0.2837 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024 and was at its lowest, -0.5255 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2002.
That places Moldova 86th out of 207 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Moldova, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -0.1421 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -0.0925 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -34.9% |
| 2000 | -0.2382 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +157.5% |
| 2002 | -0.5255 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +120.6% |
| 2003 | -0.4944 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.9% |
| 2004 | -0.3764 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -23.9% |
| 2005 | -0.4208 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +11.8% |
| 2006 | -0.0988 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -76.5% |
| 2007 | -0.095 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.8% |
| 2008 | -0.1194 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +25.7% |
| 2009 | -0.1914 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +60.3% |
| 2010 | 0.0836 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -143.7% |
| 2011 | 0.2324 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +178.0% |
| 2012 | 0.0215 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -90.7% |
| 2013 | -0.0686 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -418.1% |
| 2014 | -0.0337 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -50.8% |
| 2015 | -0.0642 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +90.5% |
| 2016 | -0.104 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +61.9% |
| 2017 | -0.1105 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +6.3% |
| 2018 | -0.1678 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +51.8% |
| 2019 | -0.1509 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -10.1% |
| 2020 | -0.0884 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -41.4% |
| 2021 | 0.0253 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -128.6% |
| 2022 | 0.0872 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +244.9% |
| 2023 | 0.2629 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +201.5% |
| 2024 | 0.2837 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +7.9% |
Moldova compared with similar countries
- Moldova's 0.2837 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is -0.1051 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (59 countries reporting)
- Moldova's 0.2837 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.8873 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 32% of the median. (53 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.1173 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1421 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0925 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -0.2844 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5255 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.095 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -0.0362 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1678 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2324 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.1141 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0884 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2837 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Moldova
More reference data data for Moldova
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2466 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1366 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.6117 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.118 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.6117 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.8268 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.4303 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.5193 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.92 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.6426 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in Moldova?
- Voice and accountability - governance estimate in Moldova was 0.2837 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Moldova?
- The highest recorded value was 0.2837 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Moldova?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.5255 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2002.
- How does Moldova rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Moldova ranks 86th out of 207 countries with data for 2024.
- Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in Moldova?
- Over the last ten years it is up 941.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Moldova data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.