Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol in Hong Kong

Hong Kong: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol was 92.31 in 2014. β–² Rising

Latest (2014)
92.31
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
3rd
of 181 countries
All-time high
92.31
in 2006
All-time low
53.85
in 2005
Years of data
10
2005–2014

Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol in Hong Kong, 2005–2014

0204060801002005200920142005: 53.82006: 92.32007: 92.32008: 92.32009: 92.32010: 92.32011: 92.32012: 92.32013: 92.32014: 92.3

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2014, trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol in Hong Kong stood at 92.31. That is the highest value across all 10 years on record.

That represents a change of up 71.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol in Hong Kong peaked at 92.31 in 2006 and was at its lowest, 53.85, in 2005.

That places Hong Kong 3rd out of 181 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the top 10%.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 84.62 53.85 92.31 5
2010s 92.31 92.31 92.31 5

Countries ranked near Hong Kong

  1. 1 Djibouti 76.92 compare
  2. 1 France 100 compare
  3. 1 Ireland 100 compare
  4. 1 Kosovo 61.54 compare
  5. 3 Canada 92.31 compare
  6. 3 Denmark 92.31 compare
  7. 3 Italy 92.31 compare
  8. 3 South Korea 92.31 compare
  9. 3 Panama 92.31 compare
  10. 3 Singapore 92.31 compare
  11. 3 Sweden 92.31 compare

See the full ranking of 183 places β†’

More reference data data for Hong Kong

All data for Hong Kong β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol in Hong Kong?
Trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol in Hong Kong was 92.31 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol recorded in Hong Kong?
The highest recorded value was 92.31 in 2006.
What is the lowest trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol recorded in Hong Kong?
The lowest recorded value was 53.85 in 2005.
How does Hong Kong rank for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol?
Hong Kong ranks 3rd out of 181 countries with data for 2014.
Is trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol rising or falling in Hong Kong?
Over the last ten years it is up 71.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Hong Kong data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol in Hong Kong. Statizoid. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-documents-to-import-number-db06-15-methodology-score/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-documents-to-import-number-db06-15-methodology-score/hong-kong-sar-china/">Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol in Hong Kong</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.