Hong Kong, China vs Singapore: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15)
Hong Kong, China
92.31
in 2014
Singapore
92.31
in 2014
Hong Kong, China rank
3rd
Singapore rank
3rd
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15) over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Singapore
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 92.31 against 92.31 in Singapore, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong, China ranks 3rd and Singapore ranks 3rd of 184 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 84.62 | 92.31 | 7.69 | Singapore |
| 2010s | 92.31 | 92.31 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15), Hong Kong, China or Singapore?
- Hong Kong, China, at 92.31 against 92.31 in Singapore as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15) between Hong Kong, China and Singapore?
- 0, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Singapore?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Singapore rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15)?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 3rd and Singapore ranks 3rd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.