Is trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol rising or falling in Denmark?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol in Denmark

Name: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol in Denmark
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Denmark: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol was 92.31 in 2014. ▬ Flat

Latest (2014)

92.31

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

3rd

of 181 countries

All-time high

92.31

in 2005

All-time low

92.31

in 2005

Years of data

2005–2014

Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol in Denmark, 2005–2014

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol in Denmark is 92.31, measured in 2014. That is the highest value across all 10 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol in Denmark peaked at 92.31 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 92.31, in 2005.

That places Denmark 3rd out of 181 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the top 10%.

Averages by decade

Decade	Average	Lowest	Highest	Years
2000s	92.31	92.31	92.31	5
2010s	92.31	92.31	92.31	5

Countries ranked near Denmark

1 France 100 compare
1 Ireland 100 compare
3 Canada 92.31 compare
3 Hong Kong 92.31 compare
3 Italy 92.31 compare
3 South Korea 92.31 compare
3 Panama 92.31 compare
3 Singapore 92.31 compare
3 Sweden 92.31 compare

See the full ranking of 183 places →

More reference data data for Denmark

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.1 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1915 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.65 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.4109 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.65 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.7 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 2.16 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.03 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 12.99 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.24 (2050)

All data for Denmark →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol in Denmark?: Trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol in Denmark was 92.31 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol recorded in Denmark?: The highest recorded value was 92.31 in 2005.
What is the lowest trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol recorded in Denmark?: The lowest recorded value was 92.31 in 2005.
How does Denmark rank for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol?: Denmark ranks 3rd out of 181 countries with data for 2014.
Is trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol rising or falling in Denmark?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Denmark data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.