Canada vs Hong Kong (China): Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15)
Canada
92.31
in 2014
Hong Kong (China)
92.31
in 2014
Canada rank
3rd
Hong Kong (China) rank
3rd
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15) over time
- Canada
- Hong Kong (China)
How they compare
Canada currently reports 92.31 against 92.31 in Hong Kong (China), a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Canada ahead.
Canada ranks 3rd and Hong Kong (China) ranks 3rd of 183 countries.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Hong Kong (China) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 92.31 | 84.62 | 7.69 | Canada |
| 2010s | 92.31 | 92.31 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15), Canada or Hong Kong (China)?
- Canada, at 92.31 against 92.31 in Hong Kong (China) as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15) between Canada and Hong Kong (China)?
- 0, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Hong Kong (China)?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Canada and Hong Kong (China) rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15)?
- Canada ranks 3rd and Hong Kong (China) ranks 3rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.