France vs Hong Kong, China: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15)
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15) over time
- France
- Hong Kong, China
How they compare
France currently reports 100 against 92.31 in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 7.69.
That makes France's figure about 1.1 times Hong Kong, China's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.
France ranks 1st and Hong Kong, China ranks 3rd of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, France averaged higher in 1 and Hong Kong, China in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | France | Hong Kong, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 73.85 | 84.62 | 10.77 | Hong Kong, China |
| 2010s | 100 | 92.31 | 7.69 | France |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15), France or Hong Kong, China?
- France, at 100 against 92.31 in Hong Kong, China as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15) between France and Hong Kong, China?
- 7.69, with France ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for France and Hong Kong, China?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do France and Hong Kong, China rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15)?
- France ranks 1st and Hong Kong, China ranks 3rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.