Hong Kong (China) vs Panama: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15)
Hong Kong (China)
92.31
in 2014
Panama
92.31
in 2014
Hong Kong (China) rank
3rd
Panama rank
3rd
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15) over time
- Hong Kong (China)
- Panama
How they compare
Hong Kong (China) currently reports 92.31 against 92.31 in Panama, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Panama has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong (China) ranks 3rd and Panama ranks 3rd of 183 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong (China) | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 84.62 | 92.31 | 7.69 | Panama |
| 2010s | 92.31 | 92.31 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15), Hong Kong (China) or Panama?
- Hong Kong (China), at 92.31 against 92.31 in Panama as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15) between Hong Kong (China) and Panama?
- 0, with Hong Kong (China) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong (China) and Panama?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Hong Kong (China) and Panama rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15)?
- Hong Kong (China) ranks 3rd and Panama ranks 3rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.